Bkk Brian

So they spend millions enriching it to 60% because their intention was to then reduce it to 3-5%.......LOL. What planet are you on? In the mean time its still possible to get a nuclear weapon without enriching to 90% as 60% is enough for a basic weapon. 60 percent HEU stock alone is enough material to fuel at least nine nuclear weapons without further enrichment to weapons grade. While these more rudimentary, or “crude,” weapons would be too large to mount on a ballistic missile, Tehran could still test them and threaten Israel with attack by delivering them via truck or shipping container. https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2025/06/23/location-of-irans-highly-enriched-uranium-uncertain-but-it-likely-cannot-build-nuclear-weapons-now/

This is a major sign of Hamas’s continued loss of power. And before the anti-Israel crowd and newly created military "Xperts" start shouting, no, this is not about handing Gaza over to some clan or criminal gang. The Gaza Strip can still be demilitarized and deradicalized later. But step one is clear: defeat and remove Hamas from both military and political power.

Well of course he's not disputing there are deaths in Gaza, its a frigging war zone! Some of his own aid workers have been killed by Hamas in Gaza.

Did I claim that? Is there evidence either way? I take it you never read the latest from Grossi then..

I couldn't care less, you were responding to alleged Trump lying on the damage. Read the report I referred to and see if you still think that rather than all this MAGA gullible nonsense

Or maybe not. Have you read what Grossi said yesterday?

You claimed people were gullible, I agreed that those who believed the CNN report were indeed gullible. You don't like my reply but its a fact.

Rubbish, the new assessment by the head of the UN Nuclear watch dog paints a picture that is far nearer to Trumps rendition than to the CNN leaked report who the gullible took in. Like I said read it.

They did exactly what they were intended to do. The latest damage assessment by IAEA is a must read and is a far closer rendition to Trumps claims than the dodgy CNN leaked report

Deflection. I suggest you read up on the latest assessment from IAEA

The only gullible were those taken in by the CNN report with cherry picked data that Iran's nuclear capabilities were only put back by a few months

Yes exactly those trucks were there trying to cover up the shafts to reinforce them and as I mentioned in the post above, the IAEA team were actually at Fordo with the Iranians the day before it got hit by the US which means they were there when the trucks were. So very doubtful the Uranium was moved.

The NYT leaves out a lot and one of the important points it left out was that the IAEA team were actually at Fordo with the Iranians the day before it got hit by the US.

? that's up to them if they are interested or not..........lol but repeating the exact same quotes that I posted is just ridiculous

Wiping out certainly happened to some facilities I don't know anyone that was claiming the whole nuclear program was all wiped out. and why are you repeating what I had already posted?

The mission objective was simple and as stated to the UN Security Council "effectively fulfilled our narrow objective: to degrade Iran's capacity to produce a nuclear weapon," Latest damage assessments from Rafael Grossi, the head of the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog are excellent news. "the nuclear program has definitely suffered “enormous damage.” Centrifuges at Fordo ‘No Longer Operational,’ U.N. Nuclear Watchdog Head Says The director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency said that there was “no escaping significant physical damage” after a U.S. strike on the Iranian facility. He declined to say how far Iran’s nuclear program had been set back. “Perhaps decades, depending on the type of activity or objective,” Mr. Grossi said, echoing comments made by President Trump this week at a NATO summit in the Netherlands. “It’s true that with these reduced capacities,” he added, “it will be much more difficult for Iran to continue at the same pace as before.” https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/26/world/middleeast/centrifuges-fordo-damage-iran.html https://archive.ph/JYldV

What about Zohran Mamdani?

I found this extremely interesting, 15 years in the planning with many actual simulations with mock ups of Fordor and a refinement right at the very end to allow for a new concrete capping that Iran had placed. Everything went according to plan and the pilots reported seeing flashes so bright they lit up the sky. Pentagon Reveals Bunker-Busting Bomb Used on Iran's Nuclear Facility

mmmm in the UK after too many were leaving they are now doing a u turn

Meanwhile the wealth and its money that so may New Yorkers rely on will leave if he gets in. New York is home to approximately 350,000 millionaires and 123 billionaires, according to Forbes, and many are seriously thinking about leaving the city. Bill Ackman, one of New York’s most vocal billionaires, has long said that a Mamdani victory could lead to an exodus. In a post on X on Thursday, he said: “The ability for New York City to offer services for the poor and needy, let alone the average New Yorker, is entirely dependent on New York City being a business-friendly environment and a place where wealthy residents are willing to spend 183 days and assume the associated tax burden. Unfortunately, both have already started making arrangements for the exits.” https://www.thetimes.com/us/news-today/article/millionaires-flee-new-york-mamdani-zohran-qbrfnddx3 https://archive.ph/YeM19

“We call on other countries to also support the GHF….a track record of distributing over 46 million meals distributed to date, all while preventing Hamas’ looting is ABSOLUTELY INCREDIBLE and should be COMMENDED and SUPPORTED. From day one, we said we are open to creative solutions that securely provide aid to those in Gaza and protects Israel. The support is simply the latest iteration of @POTUS's and @SecRubio's pursuit of peace in the region.” @StateDept Principal Deputy Spokesperson Tommy Piggot

Your claim was false and your further denial is even more dishonest and shows that you cannot actually debate at all. This is not what really happened.

No, you posted a very specific and false claim, own it, why try to deny it?

Certainly not holding my breath on this......... Mediator: Ceasefire-hostage deal between Israel and Hamas possible ‘within days’ A Palestinian-American political activist who has been mediating between the Trump administration and Hamas said Tuesday that it was possible to reach a Gaza ceasefire and hostage release deal “within days.” Bishara Bahbah, who is mediating alongside Egypt and Qatar, said in an interview with the Jordanian Al Ghad TV channel that he was optimistic about the chances for a deal following the ceasefire struck hours earlier between Israel and Iran, arguing that it put Gaza back atop the regional agenda. https://www.timesofisrael.com/mediator-ceasefire-hostage-deal-between-israel-and-hamas-possible-within-days/

What really happened: https://aseannow.com/topic/1364757-“pickaxe-mountain”-iran’s-secret-nuclear-stronghold-that-defies-us-bombs/ But hey, don't let facts get in the way of some much needed pearl clutching. What facts are in that article to back up your claims of what really happened?