Bkk Brian

Iran are getting decimated and desperate to find a way out. Iran held direct talks with US amid intensifying conflict with Israel, diplomats say They said the talks included a brief discussion of a U.S. proposal given to Iran at the end of May that aims to create a regional consortium that would enrich uranium outside of Iran, an offer Tehran has so far rejected. U.S. and Iranians officials did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment on the matter. This week's phone discussions were the most substantive direct talks since the two began negotiations in April. On those occasions, in Oman and Italy, the two men exchanged brief words when they encountered each other after indirect talks were held. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/iran-held-direct-talks-with-us-amid-intensifying-conflict-with-israel-diplomats-2025-06-19/

Its from MAGA voters not Murdoch but if you want one that is non partisan: Hill Poll: Voters willing to see US attack Iran over nuclear weapons Nearly half of likely voters think the United States should be willing to use military force to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, according to this week’s The Hill Poll. Forty-nine percent said military force should be used, while 31 percent said it should not and 20 percent were not sure. https://thehill.com/polls/105058-hill-poll-voters-willing-to-see-us-attack-iran-over-nuclear-weapons/

No a poll that shows MAGA is in favour of direct action contrary to the claim made that I was responding to.

Carlson and Greene are not his MAGA base MAGA voters overwhelmingly support US strikes on Iranian military: poll An overwhelming number of self-described “MAGA Republicans” would back US strikes against Iranian military outposts and other infrastructure amid Israel’s military campaign against the theocratic regime, a new poll found. A whopping 65% of “MAGA Republicans” would back strikes on Iran, compared to a paltry 19% opposed, which even eclipses the support for such military action among more traditional Republicans, according to a J.L. Partners survey shared exclusively with The Post. By contrast, self-described “traditional” Republicans would back strikes against Iran 51% to 28%. Meanwhile, Republican voters writ large would support the US government launching strikes on Iran by 58% to 25%, with 17% neutral or unsure, per the poll. https://nypost.com/2025/06/18/us-news/maga-voters-overwhelmingly-support-us-strikes-on-iranian-military-poll/

What have they advised him in this then?

Again his decision is not based on MAGA. Perhaps instead of deflection you should concentrate on the OP:

This is not about MAGA. It's about taking an important decision without haste or do you prefer him to attack now without waiting?

It's here

This is not about you know who. This is about Rocket man and him already having nukes so an impossibility to deal with now. It's too late.

Bit late. It's already got nukes

GHF OPERATIONAL UPDATE - THURSDAY, JUNE 19, 2025 Nearly 3 million meals today across three distribution sites More than 33.5 million meals distributed to date  The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) continued its operations today to provide vital food aid for the Palestinian people in Gaza. Below is an update on today’s operations:

From your link. Gaza's health ministry said on Thursday that since midnight 12 people had been killed while seeking aid, without giving further details. So another message direct from Hamas. INACCURATE NEWS REPORTING: Our GHF news monitoring continues to reveal inaccurate news coverage by the international media outlets linking GHF sites to violent incidents that did not occur near our sites but occurred at United Nations’ (UN) convoy sites. We continue to experience a growing pattern of false information seemingly formulated by the Gaza Health Ministry

This is fun, your turn next.........by the way, "if" the US strikes a few Nuclear sites in Iran it is not a war...... Trump's stance against Iran nuclear ambitions backed by vast majority of Americans: poll Republicans show strongest backing for potential Israeli airstrikes while Dems remain skeptical https://www.foxnews.com/politics/americans-say-its-crucial-nations-security-iran-doesnt-obtain-nuclear-weapons-poll

But not with his MAGA base eh.... & like I said, pick your poll......... By contrast, self-described “traditional” Republicans would back strikes against Iran 51% to 28%. Meanwhile, Republican voters writ large would support the US government launching strikes on Iran by 58% to 25%, with 17% neutral or unsure, per the poll.

Pick your poll eh............... Published 19th June Republican senators line up behind Trump on Israel-Iran conflict as MAGA base splits on issue Senate Republicans largely lined up behind President Donald Trump's handling of the conflict between Iran and Israel and said they trusted Trump's judgment on whether the United States ought to involve itself. Trump said again Wednesday that he has not decided whether the U.S. should get more involved in the He signaled to reporters that he would decide at the last moment, stating he’d make the decision “one second before.” https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/republican-senators-line-trump-israel-iran-conflict/story?id=122983252

Regardless of MAGA a strong majority of the US public back the Israeli strikes if the deal fell though which it obviously did. Doing the dirty work for the world as Germany said at G7. A MAJORITY BACK AN ISRAELI STRIKE ON IRAN IF TALKS FAIL, AND 74% SAY IRAN GIVING UP NUCLEAR ENRICHMENT SHOULD BE A PRECONDITION FOR ANY DEAL https://harvardharrispoll.com/

Actually the majority are in favour though.......... MAGA voters overwhelmingly support US strikes on Iranian military: poll An overwhelming number of self-described “MAGA Republicans” would back US strikes against Iranian military outposts and other infrastructure amid Israel’s military campaign against the theocratic regime, a new poll found. A whopping 65% of “MAGA Republicans” would back strikes on Iran, compared to a paltry 19% opposed, which even eclipses the support for such military action among more traditional Republicans, according to a J.L. Partners survey shared exclusively with The Post. By contrast, self-described “traditional” Republicans would back strikes against Iran 51% to 28%. Meanwhile, Republican voters writ large would support the US government launching strikes on Iran by 58% to 25%, with 17% neutral or unsure, per the poll. https://nypost.com/2025/06/18/us-news/maga-voters-overwhelmingly-support-us-strikes-on-iranian-military-poll/

The final attack plans are approved by Trump. Now its a wait and see........ Trump privately approved attack plans for Iran pending final order, WSJ reports WASHINGTON, June 18 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump told senior aides late Tuesday that he approved attack plans for Iran but has withheld a final order to see if Tehran would abandon its nuclear program, the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday, citing three people familiar with the deliberations. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/trump-privately-approved-attack-plans-iran-pending-final-order-wsj-reports-2025-06-18/

There are lies going on but its not from the Inspectors, just you. Please provide a link to your claim. As the IAEA dispute it.. Read below "It summarised developments in recent years and pointed more clearly towards coordinated, secret activities, some of which were relevant to producing nuclear weapons." Damning IAEA report spells out past secret nuclear activities in Iran May 31 (Reuters) - Iran carried out secret nuclear activities with material not declared to the U.N. nuclear watchdog at three locations that have long been under investigation, the watchdog said in a wide-ranging, confidential report to member states seen by Reuters. The findings in the "comprehensive" International Atomic Energy Agency report requested by the agency's 35-nation Board of Governors in November pave the way for a push by the United States, Britain, France and Germany for the board to declare Iran in violation of its non-proliferation obligations. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/iaea-report-says-iran-had-secret-activities-with-undeclared-nuclear-material-2025-05-31/ https://archive.ph/6lJy1 UN report says uranium particles enriched up to 83.7 percent found in Iran Inspectors from the United Nations nuclear watchdog found uranium particles enriched up to 83.7 percent in Iran’s underground Fordo nuclear site, a report seen Tuesday by The Associated Press said. The confidential quarterly report by the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency distributed to member states likely will renew tensions between Iran and the West over its program. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/un-report-says-uranium-particles-enriched-up-to-83-7-percent-found-in-iran Global watchdog finds Iran failing to meet nuclear obligations The global nuclear watchdog's board of governors has formally declared Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in 20 years. Nineteen of the 35 countries on the board of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) voted for the motion, which was backed by the US, UK, France and Germany. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce3v6w2qr12o "Iran condemned the resolution as "political" and said it would open a new enrichment facility."

Trumped by the Global watchdog

Feel free to link to where Pete Hegseth the U.S. Secretary of Defense thinks otherwise. Did you read your own link? The Nuclear program was clearly being violated. Global watchdog finds Iran failing to meet nuclear obligations The global nuclear watchdog's board of governors has formally declared Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in 20 years. Nineteen of the 35 countries on the board of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) voted for the motion, which was backed by the US, UK, France and Germany. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce3v6w2qr12o "Iran condemned the resolution as "political" and said it would open a new enrichment facility."

Just waiting for the usual suspects to push out this false claim. This has absolutely nothing to do with GHF, it is fake news from the Hamas “Health Ministry” spread by once reputable media outlets. They are now spreading lies. There were no such incidences in any proximity to our sites (in fact, we delivered nearly 2M meals today).

Does it fit yours then? The Hamas-run civil defence agency said Israeli troops fired on crowds near the aid site in Khan Younis

Hardly any food has entered northern Gaza for nearly four months. Not true but you knew that already

Many inside Iran are burning photos of Khamenei and Khomeini