dinsdale

Correct. My apologies. According to articles I have now seen it was being towed out of the hanger bay.

He is the POTUS so he does run the country and the US is the most powerful nation on Earth so your thread although obviously started for those with the syndrome has a reasonably accurate title.

Simple. Some on here will never admit they're wrong no matter what evidence is given. They'd argue black and blue that white is actually black and black is actually white.

Egg prices down, fuel prices down, no tax on tips, no tax on social security pension and inflation down for two consecutive months now at 2.4% for March.

So when it's anti-Trump it's the truth but when there's an article about what Trump is actually achieving it's propaganda. Thank you for displaying the mindset of those afflicted the the syndrome. I've said on other occasions he could end all wars, all disease and abolish all hunger and people like you would still find something to complain about. It's just pitiful. As for the article itself it's not that great in that it doesn't list what's actually been achieved in his first 100 days which is A LOT.

Again this reads like AI and AI that's not quite native English. Translator? So you say you're going to post the real facts. Ok. Let's see.

Nukes don't need to be moved closer. The whole tactical vs strategic nuke missile is a misconception. Sure one has a shorter range than the other but under MAD it doesn't matter. It's a nuke. Launch a nuke be it tactical or strategic and that's it. The end. This is why the mad men in Iran should never be allowed nukes, The end for them is going to a place where virgins are waiting for them. Religious nutters. Putin won't launch and neither will anyone else.

Relax man. If I haven't answered your questions could you please repost them and show how I didn't answer them otherwise this is just straw manning and deflection which of course is a tactic used by those who know they are wrong and simply won't admit it or too stupid to know they are wrong. You talk about facts Please repost all of your posts that are referenced. How's that for deflection.

Sort of agree. I don't think Russia will have any worries after this is settled. The biggest threat has been for a long time and still is China.

Nice. Each sheep should have MSM on them.

I suggest you research US involvent in NATO. Obviously your knowledge in this is lacking.

Thank you. Maybe you can learn from those of us on here who have indivdual thought and critical thinking skills.

Yeh I'm with you. The line fed to and absorbed by the sheeple. Reminds me of get vaccinated to save granny.

Again your intellect is on full display for all to see.

The nuclear thing was Putin sabre rattling as he does but pushed by legacy media to make the sheeple believe there was a real threat.

Trump siding with Putin is only what you have conceived in your mind which has been planted and fermented by the looney left progressive democrats, the looney left legacy media and all those looney progressive leftists parroting the message. Trump needs to deal with two stubborn opponents. One quite clearly has the military upper hand and the other doesn't. One wants to keep what has been taken and the other doesn't want it to be taken away. Militarily Putin clearly has the upper hand. The only hand to be played by the US and the EU is economic. This whole betrayal and Putin's puppet rubbish is so far from reality yet those of you afflicted with the syndrome hold onto it. Rationale my friends has left you behind.

Correct. This was the US's goal and still is the EU's goal. I've said this many times and asked for responses many times but as I've said previously I only get deflections, unintelligent responses and negative emojis. The level of intelligence on this forum has IMHO dropped dramatically in the last few years. Now flooded with deflections, outright stupidity and a certain mass delusion emanating from the looney left.

How did Trump betray NATO? You say things but never go on to back them up. How about a google search and post something about "How Trump Betrayed NATO". Trump has from what I've seen said the EU has to cough up more money and stop relying on US taxpayers. Am I incorrect in this?

And who is going to do this? Again another ridiculous comment. Change in Russia will only come from within. Defeat Russia militarily? This is truly just a troll comment or a comment from someone with very little intellect.

This has to be one of your more ridiculous posts. Let's see. Trying to stop the war? Could that be the context in a thread about the war in Ukraine? Sorry but your stupidity seems to be without bounds. As for building rapport you must be joking. I feel absolutely no need to do this on here.

Let's see who's right. Basically if the US says no then it's no. NATO as it is exists as it is only because of the US. To think otherwise would be deluded.

Again Ukraine is not going to be part of NATO and you want is to add more gunpowder to the powder keg by increasing Ukraine's military strengths. This isn't going to happen either after a ceasefire is hopefully agreed to by all parties. As sad as it is Ukraine is going to become a buffer zone. What the future holds neither you or I can tell.

A pitiful deflection from the topic which is all I'd expect from you. Why not address the point I made that at least Trump is trying compared to sleepy Joe who was not medically fit to be POTUS and did nothing. Looking forward to your next intellectually stunted reply.

Sharia law coming soon to Muslim run enclaves in Britain. Am I being racist or overly alarmist?

Fact is Putin saw it as a threat and said so. The EU and the US supported NATO expansion. Yes, the EU reduced it's NATO spending but still the US was and still is the backbone of NATO. Trump wants this to change. Question is did the EU and the US want Russia to invade Ukraine? Was NATO expansion used a trigger/bait to get Putin to invade? Has Ukraine just been a pawn in a much larger scenario? I have posited these questions on here before but without intelligent replies. Certainly get plenty of the unintelligent/anonymised negative emojis from those without the balls or intelligence to dispute these assertions and which I expect again with this post. I'm genuinely interested to see any comments to argue Ukraine hasn't been used as a pawn in a proxy war against Russia.