dinsdale

Cheers and I agree with your post but I am in no way praising the merits of mRNA vaccines. What I am saying is it should only be for the vulnerable. Apart from that I have stated many times I am not anti vaccination as such. Children should have their vaccinations against measles, diphtheria, polio etc. I have sometime within the last decade (can't exactly remember) had the rabies jabs and tetanus. Rabies jabs certainly had some side effects. I also had 2 AZ in 2021. I will not have another jab for covid. It's the mRNA technology I have a problem with along with the censorship that has been put in place.

There are people for whom the vaccine is probably a good thing and then there are those where it's not needed. Now it's Omicron this is certainly the case evidenced by govts recommending jabs only for the vulnurable and those over a particular age. I think in the UK it's now 70 yrs old.

It's 48 hrs because they didn't test after that.

"Anti-vax posters" It really does seem that you can't or just wont get it into your head that one can have grave misgivings about mRNA vaccines and NOT BE AN ANTI-VAXER. Not mutually inclusive as I have stated many times.

Being dictated to by big pharma and the governments in their pockets isn't freedom. People should be able to make their own informed decisions which means ALL available research and information should be on the table not just that which gets the tick of approaval from the vested interests. As for misinformation why was AZ called safe and effective when it wasn't (as is public knowelge AZ caused blood clots and the product was withdrawn). I'll tell you. Money. How about the fact that mRNA spike proteins are found throughout the body when the manufacturers of said product said this would not be the case. A study involving rats showed a wide systemic distibution of spike proteinsand this was before the emergency approaval of the mRNA vaccines. The public were told that it stays in the deltoid muscle. Clear misinformation. https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-2389-06.pdf

Campbell intimates a link between the white blood clots and the vaccines. Question is why doesn't he say; that because the period in which these clots first appeared correlates with the vaccine rollout there appears a link may, or may not exist, but further independant investigation is needed. He can't. If he said this YT would delete the upload and strike his channel. Freedom of speech is no longer allowed. Thou Shalt Not Question the Narrative. There is only one truth.

The citations you make are from those who pushed the narrative. GDP? No lockdown was the only reason for this? The number of daily infections would indicate that to some extent it did work.

As oppposed to so many other countries where people were forced to get vaccinated otherwise they would lose their jobs. Young healthy people. Why?

In conclusion, Sweden experienced relatively fewer deaths per population unit than most other high-income countries that implemented stricter lockdown measures. It is concerning that some scientists who advocated for stringent measures seem to disregard real-world data and cling to their version of reality. The ability to learn from mistakes and acknowledge that hypotheses may be wrong is essential for future pandemic preparedness. This, coupled with careful analysis, is crucial for developing effective strategies in the face of future outbreaks. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10399217/#:~:text=In conclusion%2C Sweden experienced relatively,that implemented stricter lockdown measures.

The virus will spread that's the nature of it. This is Sweeden which didn't lockdown. Apart from this the lockdown policy wasn't based on evidence. It was a reaction. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/sweden/

On Wikipedia, you're not allowed to edit articles about yourself (or your best friend, or your boss, or the skunk who lives under your porch). Wikipedia's long-held conflict of interest policy limits an article's contributors to anonymous strangers and unrelated randos for the sake of objectivity. But this can be frustrating to subjects of articles and those who love them, especially when information is wrong, outdated, or weird. If you're the subject of a Wikipedia article, you can certainly change your article without editing it directly. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Editing_Your_Own_Page

Everything he posts is supported by citations from legitimate sources. If you agree or disagree is up to you but at least he gives the opportunity to make informed decisions.

I agree but IMO the experts were silenced and the misinformation peddlers are those who pushed the narrative and forced populations into conformity NOT based on evidence based science. Lockdowns were a perfect example of this.

https://retractionwatch.com/2024/02/19/paper-claiming-extensive-harms-of-covid-19-vaccines-to-be-retracted/ Exactly. Great example. Cheers. The vaccines "purportedly" have caused deaths, injuries, blood clots, been found in multiple organs in the body, been found in mothers milk all puportedly of course.

Many real doctors and scientists were threatened if the didn't follow the narrative. People lost employment because they didn't want to be jabbed. This is not democracy. Again I say that going against the claim that the jabs were safe and effective as claimed was a consipracy theory in the early days. Now it's a fact. And you keep going on about misinformation well here's some for you...

How about efficacy debate. Censored. Safety debate. Censored. Possible other treatments. Censored. Any negative comment about the vaccines. Censored. All were called conspiracy theories. The only narrative allowed was the one supporting the vaccines. This is not how it should be in a democratic system where freedom of speech is one of the main underpinnings.

So. Insinuation and statement are two different things. He's simply questioning if there is a causal link. Is there? Maybe, maybe not but what is certain is that independant investigation is required.

Watch .........the.......video. No such claims were made. You are just strawmanning.

Again no one has claimed that the vaccines are linked to the white clots. The thing is they are real and there needs to be investgation into the cause. Your last dot point is telling though. The clots are found in arteries not vessels. Blood clots vessels, white clots arteries. Watch the videos and educate yourself before doing your usual cherry picking stunts.

So many bodies. Long term refrigeration. Is this still the case? Yep blood clots will form but if you actually watch the videos you will see that these are not postmortem blood clots which are jelly like and these white clots are rubbery. Seems that they've been found in the living also.

Have you watched the videos? My guess is you haven't. I don't think anyone has directly linked these clots with vaccinations but they exist and need to be investigated. If you are going to argue against or discredit someone then you need to know what they are saying not just rely on cherry picked articles.

In an information war it is those who control the information that will win. By win I mean making sure that their narrative becomes the generally accepted narrative. It is undeniable that the dominant narrative around the Covid19 years is one being pushed by big pharma, governments, the UN and mainstream media.

Does make me wonder if any of those on here having a go at Campbell have actually watched any of his videos. My best guess is they haven't. Probably still think Ivermectin is only a drug for horses a line that was heavily pushed.

Misinformation? I posted (above) with citations, one from the CDC and one from the UK Heat Foundation about the similarites of symptoms. You call this misinformation? I have also stated that SarsCov2, influenza and the common cold are caused by different viruses. They do, however, have overlaping symptoms. This is undeniable. What is also undeniable is Omicron for the vast majority is a mild viral infection andf this is evidenced by very low death rates. The following charts of course do not include comorbidities or vaccinated/unvaccinated details. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/ The 3rd chart is the USA. Overall around 83 deaths out of around 430 million people in a day (yes they are different days but this will have no bearing on the very, very, very.....small number of deaths). This IS NOT misinformation. These are facts.

I sorry that you didn't see that I acknowledged the fact of long covid but you are simply ignoring the fact that there is a commonality of symptoms (EXCLUDING LONG COVID) and that for the vast majority Omicron is a mild viral infection similar to the common cold. Indeed it can be completely asymptomatic.