dinsdale

Then you will know this but have failed to mention it. Best not to call other people disingenuous when it can clearly be argued this is exactly what you've been. Gaetz, 42, who represented Florida’s District 1 covering part of the Florida Panhandle, was investigated by the FBI on sex-trafficking allegations involving a 17-year-old and was not charged with any crime. The federal investigation ended last year. Gaetz has said he was the target of an extortion plot. A House Ethics Committee investigation was launched in April 2021. It was deferred at the request of the Department of Justice and reauthorized in 2023 after the department withdrew that deferral request. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/woman-told-house-ethics-committee-saw-gaetz-sex-minor-lawyer-says-rcna180435 As for the Ethics Committee Report The report comes years after DOJ dropped its investigation into the same claims on the grounds that the two central witnesses had serious credibility issues. Yet these are the same two central witnesses the House Ethics Committee has relied on for its critical report of Gaetz—the same report it is leaking to compliant reporters as part of a coordinated effort to thwart his nomination as President-elect Donald Trump’s next attorney general. https://thefederalist.com/2024/11/17/house-probe-into-matt-gaetz-relies-on-witnesses-doj-found-lacked-credibility/ "I'm going to strongly request that the Ethics Committee not issue the report, because that is not the way we do things in the House," Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, told reporters in the US Capitol. Gaetz, 42, who denies any wrongdoing, resigned from Congress on Wednesday, bringing the ethics probe to an end two days before the committee had been expected to release the document. The former congressman faced a nearly three-year Justice Department investigation into sex-trafficking allegations involving a 17-year-old girl. His office said in 2023 he had been told by prosecutors he would not be charged. Johnson said he planned to urge House Ethics Committee Chairman Michael Guest not to provide the Gaetz report to the Senate Judiciary Committee. "The rules of the House have always been that a former member is beyond the jurisdiction of the Ethics Committee," said Johnson, who returned on Friday morning from meeting Trump at the president-elect's Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida. "I think it's a terrible breach of protocol and tradition and the spirit of the rule," he added. "I think that would be a terrible precedent to set." https://www.odt.co.nz/news/world/speaker-wants-ethics-report-trump-pick-gaetz-secret

Only 34 of the 100 senate seats were up for election so no they didn't elect 2/3 of them.

I hope you're right. He should be given a free hand. Might not be conventional but that's part of the appeal of Trump. People voted for change and change they will get.

I still think he needs 60% of the Senate to do this. I might be wrong. The point is his total victory gives him a clear mandate from the people. The people have voted and their vote should be respected. (Unlike Thailand of course)

Damn! Fascist. Ah! Totalitarian. A totalitarian misogynistic fascist Nazi loving racist dictator. Have I missed any?

You forgot misogynist and dictator. A misogynist racist Nazi dictator. Haven't you learnt anything from our losers on the left. Shame on you.

The Senate is a problem. 2/3 didn't stand in this election. He's bringing together a young team and his choices should be accepted. Trump has a clear mandate and it should be respected. Will it be is the question. It's not just the Dems but the establishment Republicans that can cause trouble. The very people that the electorate are sick of.

What makes you think I'm talking about investigations happening in China? The gain of function research was initially funded by America was it not? Do you not think there are classified documents that might shine some light on things. As for the CCP not knowing, they're involved in the institute. Have no doubts they know exactly what happened. As I suggested why don't you broaden your knowledge and watch the video. Don't just rely on the one side of the story you have been told and take that as truth..

Why has China blocked such rigorous investigation then and why was research/data scrubbed? Viral data base scrubbed. Why? If there's nothing to hide then there's nothing to hide. I hope very, very much more information comes to light and Trump will be the one to get it done. The only investigation was one trip by the WHO with Peter Daszak on the team. This was a 100% conflict of interest. Why don't you watch the video from Sky. Maybe it will make you think outside of the viewpoint pushed by Fauci and the legacy media.

So there's no evidence of zoonotic transmission. FBI Director Wray acknowledges bureau assessment that Covid-19 likely resulted from lab incident https://edition.cnn.com/2023/02/28/politics/wray-fbi-covid-origins-lab-china/index.html US Energy Department assesses Covid-19 likely resulted from lab leak, furthering US intel divide over virus origin https://edition.cnn.com/2023/02/26/politics/covid-lab-leak-wuhan-china-intelligence/index.html Classified State Department Documents Credibly Suggest COVID-19 Lab Leak, Wenstrup Pushes for Declassification https://oversight.house.gov/release/classified-state-department-documents-credibly-suggest-covid-19-lab-leak-wenstrup-pushes-for-declassification/

You keep saying this but provide no evidence. Surely if it was zoonotic and originated from a single wet market animals or animal meat in said market would show the presence of this virus complete with the novel spike proteins so well suited to attach to human cells. Animals were tested and no evidence of this virus was found. There is no such evidence. Why is that?

That's why it's so good that it was Too Big To Rig. The already loony woke left progressives have now fallen right off the tree. I hope mental illness will be something else RFK Jnr. looks into. It certainly seems to be all pervasive amongst those on the losing side.

That's why there is the Electoral College and the not as crucial Popular Vote. Who won both of these????????? America went Red and you still can't accept it. Time to put on your big boy pants and move on.

Yes it was rejected but that doesn't take away from the fact that it was a proposal for research in Wuhan into spike proteins from bat coronaviruses that would bond to human cells and that Daszak has been directly associated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Peter Daszak. EcoHealth Alliance

I didn't think you'd be man enough to apologise. All you have are childish ad hominem attacks. In future please DO NOT misrepresent my posts.

No that is definitely not what I posted so please do not misrepresent my posts. My posts were: "I find it astounding that someone can still use MSNBC as a source and try and seem credible." "BTW nobody takes MSNBC seriously except for sheeple." "I'm sure the loyal sheeple are still watching but as the saying goes you can't cure stupid." A true and honest person would apologize for such a misrepresentation of a person's post.

It seems your brain power has plateaued for the day. The FACT is MSNBC viewership has plummeted. I gave only 7 citations for this but there's a lot more than that all saying the same thing. I'm sure the loyal sheeple are still watching but as the saying goes you can't cure stupid.

The DEFUSE proposal includes discussion about the planned introduction of human-specific cleavage sites into bat coronaviruses. Do you understand this? https://changingtimes.media/2024/01/19/scientists-say-ecohealth-alliances-defuse-proposal-was-a-blueprint-for-sars-cov-2/

Folk are watching MSNBC is correct. It's just a whole lot less than before. Seems somewhere around the 50% less mark.

Show anywhere that I'm an anti-vaxxer. You simply sprout the demonizing rubbish pushed by Fauci and the legacy media. Don't want to take an experimental gene therapy jab you must be an anti-vaxxer. Complete and utter BS. I have also previously provided a YT video of RFK Jnr. saying he is not an anti-vaxxer.

MSNBC primetime viewership plunged 54% in the days after Donald Trump won the White House as the network’s audience tuned away from its left-leaning coverage, according to a report. https://www.yahoo.com/news/msnbc-ratings-plunge-trump-election-213433466.html News ratings down after election, MSNBC sees 54% fall, CNN down 36% https://san.com/cc/news-ratings-down-after-election-msnbc-sees-54-fall-cnn-down-36/ MSNBC Viewership Drops by Half in Days After Trump Victory https://www.thewrap.com/msnbc-cnn-fox-news-ratings-after-trump-election/ MSNBC ratings plunge after Trump election victory — as more than half of primetime audience flees https://nypost.com/2024/11/12/media/msnbc-ratings-plunge-after-trump-election-victory/ Viewers Flee MSNBC, and Flock to Fox News, in Wake of Election https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/13/business/media/msnbc-fox-news-ratings-election.html MSNBC ratings tank again after election spike as viewers tire of anti-Trump rants https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14072525/MSNBC-ratings-drop-Trump-election.html MSNBC Ratings Plummet as Democrats Grow Weary https://www.thedailybeast.com/msnbc-ratings-plummet-as-democrats-grow-weary/