owl sees all

Not here. Dry season started last Sunday. Next rain 11th April 2024.

Thanks. As you are probably aware I am somewhat restricted in what I can post. And would like to say. But here goes. All of nature has evolved through billions of years. There are species, and plants, and animals that have died out through a multitude of reasons. We, at the present time are top of the heap. Instead of rejoicing and trying to understand how and why, we are seemingly heading for self destruction. If H-bombs and poison gas were not enough we now want to mess with our DNA. Why? Some of us ask. What can a mRNA jab do that nature can't? In my book; nothing at all. We are a wonderful bit of kit. We, through or defence/immune and maintenance systems. can cope with just about anything. Just being here shows that. However, there are a couple of problems. One, as has already been said, is the research, production and experimentation of ugly, filthy weapons. But there is more; much more. The adulteration of our food. The contamination of our beautiful rivers and oceans. The dubious quality of much of the air. And now the belief that we can somehow poison a perfectly healthy back to health. If that sounds gobblegook, it is because it is. But that's what is planned, and coming our way soon. Toxins are all around us. Mostly our bodies can easily deal with them. But not always. We can help our bodies, or hinder them, in fighting toxins. And what are these toxins? Some are naturally occurring. But the vast majority are human made. From metal fillings in our mouths. The stuff we put onto our bodies. The additives in our food. The contaminants in our water. Pesticides, fungicides. Herbicides, DDT! I could go on but life is too short. In my book the role of the WHO should be to ensure that we - as humans - do not foul the very earth that we depend upon of our survival. To help fight against the filth that is pumped into our water, and into the ground. As it is, the WHO has IMHO, completely lost its way. Of course big money steers it away from what it should be doing. That brings me nicely onto the subject of 'modern health care'. A pill of every ill. I prefer to say 'modern ill-health care'. Soon a mRNA jab for every complaint that poor living, and an unhealthy environment; happens to bring along. Weight challenged; a jab. Cancer; a jab will sort it. Arthritis; no problem. There will be a jab for this and that. It's absolute madness. What we should be doing is ensuring that everyone has fresh air, clean water, appropriate food and able to live in a loving. caring world. The body will look after us, if look after it. Don't need no pills. Don't need no jabs. Nature will see to it that we not only survive, but thrive beyond our dreams.

The problem is plain to see. Do you believe in God? No. Prove there isn't one. The natural state of the body is good health. These people are trying to out-do nature. Getting very well paid for their efforts too. We can't improve on nature. It has seen us good for billions of years. Messing with nature can only end in disaster. We must learn from it. Not impose our filthy ways on it. Nature can be destructive. It can be devastating. It can be viscous. But never ugly.

Although not addressed to me, I think I should answer. Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine are both poisons. They are essentially used for eliminating parasites, which can be a big problem in Africa and Asia especially. I believe AFDs have it wrong in that they promote(d) the use of 'these two' for covid. In my opinion, there is nothing that can help covid. When 'mectin' and 'droxy' have been used, there is sometimes a cross-over for parasite elimination and 'covid' improvement. The symptoms are listed as being similar. This is in my book where the confusion lay. An incorrect diagnosis of covid, that is subsequently eased/cured by 'mectin' or 'droxy' is really often the result of parasites being eliminated from the body. Resulting in the patient feeling better. There being no covid, in the first place, but a heavy parasitic infection. Of course this raises the question of how accurate covid infection diagnosis in third world countries actually is. If the patient can be gotten better with the parasitic drug then it was probably a parasitic infection in the first instance rather than the vague covid. Hulda Clark wrote a book* on human parasites many years ago.. Still worth a read. * The Cure For All Cancers Major themes in her books (from wiki) Diet Cleanup: Clark said that most foods and supplements were sullied by contaminants such as heavy metals and mycotoxins Homeography: According to Clark, a "new science ... which is the electronic analog of homeopathy." She said an electronic signature of a substance can be transferred into bottles making a "bottle copy" of the original substance and that it can be done indefinitely. Liver flush: She advocated the use of a "liver flush". She said it removes gallstones and parasites from the liver and bile ducts. This involves fasting, epsom salt laxatives and a mixture of olive oil and grapefruit juice (the latter being known to interact with many prescription drugs). Parasites: Clark said people have parasites that cause numerous problems. She described herbal and electronic methods to remove them, such as her Zapper device (see below). Syncrometer: A "bioresonance" device developed by Clark and claimed to detect contaminants in substances at an accuracy of one part per quadrillion (ppq). Zapper: A device to pulse low voltage direct current (DC) through the body at specific frequencies. Clark said this device kills viruses, bacteria and parasites. In one case, a patient with a cardiac pacemaker suffered arrhythmias as a side effect of her "Zapper".[18]

A queen sneaking up the outside rank. A chess term.

Simply messing with nature for money.

And fortunately some were not fooled first time round. Their sperm, and blood, will be worth a fortune in the not too distant future.

Nature will cure all. Given the chance to do so, without human abominative projects. The illnesses that you mentioned were, the body's natural response to a toxin, and often the direct result of man interfering with nature.

What I would be willing to do, is a series of essays on different aspects of the same topic. Natural Health:::::. Including; Big Pharma health products; the role of vaccines in combating illness; the Spanish flu and its implications for today; how big money killed off natural health, in the early 1900s; history of viruses even. If I could get the OK from AN that they would not take them down, or suspend me, I would. Obviously not on a thread such as this. A new one.

Sad news. The poor chap died. A life-long supporter of the club. 74 years old.

I hear what you are saying Rabas. I do not agree with any of it. Except the very last sentence; perhaps.

You put me on ignore!! Dear me! If you read my earlier post, you will see that I do/did not support their promotion of ''' ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine for treating Covid.'' And wrote an essay to explain why. Their position (as quoted) goes 100% against my beliefs. It is anti-nature. If you think that AFDs are discredited; so be it.

Not opinions at all. Well they are, but based on proven facts. Can't give you a link on this platform RW; sorry.

Joined their ranks to get a different perspective on covid. I am not in agreement with some of their statements; including the use of Ivermectin and Hydrox. And have expressed the reasons why. To get a decent range of opinions, and why people have those opinions, one should, IMO, read all possibles.

They are essays on the subject of modern medicine, the role of Big Pharma and the folly of believing in the 'white coats'. No peer reviews that I know of.

The early 1900s were the start of Big Pharma. Truth has taken a back seat ever since. Manufactured medicine pushed nature out of the way with big money.

And I say there are more worthy candidates. As I have previously posted; why this award has been given when it has. This is all simply a 'house of cards'.

So you are not done?! Good to see you back Brian. Nothing I post is any more off topic than your musings. In fact, I'm very much on-topic; as you well know. You just have no argument against the truth.

Throwing your rattles out the pram, because someone doesn't agree with you? Very adult. If you are done with me; so be it. Hope you learned something.

I guess you are talking about me. Let me tell you something Sir; I am an authority on viruses. Although I've not had a paper in Nature or Lancet, I've published many essays on the subject. In fact I write for a monthy newspaper/magazine on this very subject. None so blind as will not see.

And you cannot produce anything to support your claims that are 'truth'. The Nobel prize for medicine is simply to reinforce Big Pharma, and those that have thrown their lot in the ring. A total nonsense if ever there was one. What about a Nobel prize to Andrew Wakefield or Stefan Lanka? Much more worthy IMO.

You have it completely the wrong way round. Your position/stance is not based on any proven science or 'fact' or 'truth'. Evidence even! Nature has the answers. It's been around for a lot longer than us. Nature shows us the way. Try to learn from it Brian.

Most fact-checkers regarding medical matters are, in my opinion, compromised. Look at who funds them. Don't bite the hand that feed you. As well as being compromised, they are starting from an unproven source. Going against nature. If one builds a skyscraper in a swamp; sooner or later it will fail.

What facts? Interesting to look at where these 'fact-checkers' get their funding. In my opinion the medical, and sections of science peer reviewed papers are compromised nonsense. A well, researched and documented paper will not get 'peer reviewed' if it does not adhere to the main line. What is the main line? Simply follow the money. Can't get a article in Lancet or Nature if it asks uncomfortable questions.. Just a big boy's club.

This is a statement of your opinion. Nowt wrong with that. I con't agree with your first-line sentiment. What segments of the population would that be? But I do agree with the second line. the west's MSM have gradually turned the screw on opposing views. One of my major beefs, is with the compromised MSM. In the UK, we now have OFCOM saying what can and cannot be said on the www. The BBC, was caught out many times during covid. Not heard them retract much.