Yellowtail

Wrong Chareadi

He already posted the link, you responded to it.

Chareadi

No. All forces do not contain energy.

Okay, we all know the 34 times convicted felon Trump is a pedophile, and we all know that Trump is protecting pedophiles, yes? But if that is true, why did the Biden DOJ continue to protect all the pedophiles for four years, after Trump left office? And why did the Biden DOJ not charge, much less convict any of the countless pedophiles that Trump was, and is protecting when they had the chance? No ideas?

You are contradicting yourself again. First you said energy was being created by technology Then you admitted energy could not be created by technology Now you are back to claiming you can create energy

I have not equated force and energy, you are mistaken. Please read my post more carefully and apologize.

It is possible, but it makes no sense. First, one has to assume Biden was calling the shots at the DOJ Second, one has to assume Biden cared more about being reelected than prosecuting criminal pedophiles Third, one has to assume Biden would protect prominent Democrats that he knew to be criminal pedophiles Forth, one has to assume that so many prominent Democrats were criminal pedophiles, that the party could collapse All of these things have to be true. Biden was president, it was early in his term, he would have been a nation hero for taking down Trump and a ring of criminal pedophiles, and any blowback this would have been over by the times the midterms came.

That's what I said.

You can equate the terms force and energy, but you would again be wrong, unless you redefine the terms: force, energy and or equate.

Of you can't change what happened, but you can change history, it's done all the time.

We call this the la la la la la la la la la la la la la la la defense.

If it is your energy book. I would not refer to it as non-fiction.

You are correct, as long as you redefine force.

Only that holding up Norway, a country that gets ~90% of its energy from hundred-year-old hydro technology as a shining example it a bit silly. Incidentally, the US has well over twice the hydro Norway has, and almost 30 times the total renewables.

Crimes that the Biden DOJ concealed for four years, yes?

Norway gets most of its power from hydro

You did not use the word ignore, but that's what you said. You effectively said why worry about why the Biden DOJ did with the files, when it's Trump's DOJ now. If one thinks Trump is a pedophile, and that Trump is protecting pedophiles, do you not think it relevant why the Biden DOJ continued to protect all the pedophiles for four years after Trump left office? And is it not at all curious that the Biden DOJ did not charge, much less convict any of the countless pedophiles that one believes Trump was, and is protecting when they had the chance? I do not believe there is anything of criminal significance in the files. I already know everyone wants money, and that rich guys like to bang younger women,

I would have voted for Jackson before I would have voted for Biden, Harris or (in retrospect) Obama. I have to say Obama fooled me, what a disappointment. He really could have gone down in history as a truly great president.

Now you've changed your tune, did you do a little reading? You are correct, energy technologies cannot create energy, nothing can, at least nothing currently understood.

Okay, we all know the 34 times convicted felon Trump is a pedophile, and we all know that Trump is protecting pedophiles, yes? But if that is true, why did the Biden DOJ continue to protect all the pedophiles for four years, after Trump left office? And why did the Biden DOJ not charge, much less convict any of the countless pedophiles that Trump was, and is protecting when they had the chance? Can anyone help square this?

Little Johnny: Mommy mommy, I think I'm a girl! MAGA Mommy: Okay, do the dishes and vacuum the living room. Leftist Mommy: Okay, hurry, let's go cut off your penis before you change your mind.

Okay, per your definition, you are right. This statement is also untrue, and even further exposes you as a fraud that simply regurgitates nonsense and presents it as fact. Hey, just redefine energy like you did technology and you'll be right about this as well.

You claim anti transgender laws are being enacted in the US Maybe actually support your claim and tell is what laws in the US are anti transgender. You claimed transgender people did not enjoy full and equal civil rights. Maybe actually you could tell us what rights transgender people in the US do not enjoy. Maybe actually you are just regurgitating leftist gaslighting

You take the first line from an "online dictionary" and ignore the rest. Pathetic. You clearly know less about energy than a first-year engineering student, yet you pretend to be an expert. Your claim that: "They all [energy technologies] cost more energy to create, operate, and dispose of than they ever produce." is clearly untrue, and exposes you as the fraud you are.