Yellowtail

So now you are claiming there was a fake invoice, but your link indicated there was no invoice, which is it? Again, do you even read what you link to? From your link: "Former Trump Organization controller Jeff McConney testified that he was told Trump was reimbursing his then-lawyer Michael Cohen $130,000 but that he didn't know what exactly the repayment was for. McConney said neither his immediate supervisor, then-chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg, nor Trump told him what the payments were for." As I said, it was grossed up because it was an expense Cohen incurred on Trump's behalf, that he was being reimbursed for.

Wrong, After you support your claim that Trump's accountants labeled payments to Cohen for his legal services, and not expense reimbursement, or admit you made it up. Your own link said he was reimbursing him.

So now you are claiming there was no invoice? Again, do you even read what you link to? From your link: "Former Trump Organization controller Jeff McConney testified that he was told Trump was reimbursing his then-lawyer Michael Cohen $130,000 but that he didn't know what exactly the repayment was for. McConney said neither his immediate supervisor, then-chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg, nor Trump told him what the payments were for."

No, you have not. You did not even read the report.

Yep Three alleged I'm not wrong, and I'm not changing the subject.

Per your link, Biden absolutely did pass classified documents to his ghost-writer. Did you not read the report before you post the links? That he was so feeble-minded that he did not remember they were classified, does not make it legal. The "hand-written notes" were/are classified, and your link makes that clear. Again, you not read the stuff you link to?

So, three alleged on the grounds, and no one convicted, and again, none inside the Capital building, and no one convicted of or even (I think) charged with insurrection. Yet you call it an "armed insurrection". Just like you still believe the Russian collusion hoax.

"Covid 365"?

Right after you support your that Trump's accountants labeled payments to Cohen for his legal services, and not expense reimbursement, or admit you made it up.

Nothing wrong with paying a retainer, the 200K might have been a bit strong. Did you go to her office and confront her?

That gravy looks nice! Is that sweet potato on the side?

Exactly. That I'm smart enough to paint the house, does not mean I want to. It's no different than paying someone to do your taxes.

Also saw "Tarot" today, my wife liked it, I did not, although it had a moment of two. Tarot (2024) - IMDb

Saw "Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes" today, and if you like the apes movies, you'll like this. I thought the last one was better. Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes (2024) - IMDb

Did you see it? I thought it okay, if a bit silly.

So you support Hamas?

Per your links, Biden absolutely did pass classifies documents to his ghost-writer. Did you not read the report before you post the links? That he was so feeble-minded that he did not remember they were classified, does not make it legal.

PolitiFact: Tucker Carlson is wrong. Firearms, other weapons at Capitol on Jan. 6 https://apnews.com/article/jan-6-capitol-riot-gun-arrest-6c626e624d0025b1e14eb9a1c22a1730

You’re wrong again, you said “guns”, not “gun”. Yes, we've already agreed one guy brought one gun, and did not take it inside the Capitol building.

So, she said it, but the fact checkers ran cover for her. The fact-check also inadvertently quotes Harris telling a few lies that no one seems to care about. It also talked about her effectively calling Biden a racist. It also supports my claim that she said she believed the women, so I'm not sure what you're on about here.

Source? Source?

Source?

Paperclips

Source? You're making it up again. Your attorney does not have a copy machine? Well, that you don't know does not mean a whole lot. I know of a few.

They may have felt it was in Trump's best interest to let her continue.