Yellowtail

How thick? We never had any difficulty MIG welding galvanized up 0.8 to 3.5mm using CO2. It burns the GA off without any issue, and I don't think the ash is any more toxic than welding stick. The spatter is a PITA

Do you have anything that supports your claim?

Come on man, is that all you have? That's been responded to countless times.

Yeah, the owner is realistically out nothing, and the potential tenant gave him the money we assume in good faith. I see no legal obligation to return the money, but it was only a couple days. I would get the potential tenant a chance to substantiate their claim that the visa was denied refund the deposit after at the end of the first month the lease was supposed to run. I would not want to give a refund to someone that just found a better deal, but if the guy is telling the truth I would.

Sorry

How big do you think the cuts will be? Mortgage rates have gone from about three to eight percent in three years, yet home prices have not really come down that I can see. So, with 20% down, the payment on a $500K home has gone from about $2,000 to over $3,000 and the market does not seem to be correcting, that scares me a little. There are a lot fewer people that can crack a three K nut than a two.

I would not expect the rate cuts in the US to do much of anything. My biggest concern is that I think it's taking too long for residential real estate in US to correct, and that we'll see another crash.

And on Netflix, thanks!

Do you think it is racist to not want waves of low and no skilled people that will be a burden on social programs, are often illiterate in their own language and speak none of yours, love their own culture, often despise your culture, and will likely never assimilate? Rich people implement virtu-signaling policies that ONLY the poor will suffer the consequences of, and they better pretend to like it, or they'll be called racist haters. What's not to like? I don't doubt there are racists, everywhere, but let's keep in mind, we are talking about a country that was almost solely responsible for the eradication of slavery in the western world, so I think it a little suspect to assume half of them hate brown people.

What about an Iranian racist?

Couple of days....

Maybe where you're from

If it were found that Hamas was killing and torturing the dogs there would be a lot more outrage.

The government is not an aspect of the business.

I saw that, but how does it show that "...all the polls have been unanimous for two years.". It does not show that. I do not think I said what you're claiming I said. If you can show where I did, I will gladly apologize. And I am certain I never said pollsters don't skew the results. You just made that up. I think what I said was, that I had no reason to believe the poll inaccurate or that the data was skewed.

You said: "Typical post in defense of Brexit. The UK chose not to be part of the Federation. Despite the fact they it still enjoys considerable privileges that other nations don't, Brexit defenders still insist on additional privileges." How does your current link show that the post was a "Typical post in defense of Brexit." Or that "Brexit defenders still insist on additional privileges." I never doubted the UK left the EU.

Do you disagree with this? What ridiculous generalization have I made? I at no time said the polls were faking it, and I have no reason to think the results are false. I think you are confused. Are there polling companies that will do polls for free? Are you really arguing that there is no one funding the polls? Please be gentle....

What aspect of the business were you in? What percentage of your product was for public consumption?

Do you have anything that support this?

You responded to my post with something (this time a graph) that did not in any way address what I said. What is analysis or logic is needed? What about my claim might require backing? I'm supposed to find a "source" proving that your response did not address what I said? So, rather than explaining how in fact the graph did address what I said, which we both know you cannot do, you attack me.

My point had nothing to do with how right or wrong the people's perception is. Polls that are presented to the public are never done to establish facts. They may establish facts, but only incidentally. Someone has paid for a poll, and they want that information put before the public to influence the public. Why are you claiming the polls have been unanimous for two years, and what is that based on? I have never said the results have been skewed have I?

Like you read it.

You actually have less than nothing this time. What the polls show have nothing really to do with what I said.

The poll has nothing to do with the actual impact of Brexit. It only intends/pretends to show what the public's perception of what the impact of Brexit has been. How is the public's perception influenced? As often as not by a newspaper poll of public perception.

Every non-leftist knows....wink-wink-nudge-nudge.