Yellowtail

At the end of the day, SEER ratings do not mean a whole lot as far as savings go.

When I suggested the father pick the boy up from school, you claimed: "Yes he can go to the school and collect his son, even take the divorce documents with him to show the school who has full legal custody, but would it solve the issue?" Now you are (apparently) claiming that solving the issue is unimportant, it's only the law that is important. You've answered none of my questions, and you just repeat that because the father has custody: "...the child will be returned to the father and will be under his custody until he either gets married or reaches 20 years of age." yet you seem to have absolutely no idea how the child will be returned to the father, much less how the boy will "...remain under his custody until he either gets married or reaches 20 years of age." There is nothing stopping the boy from visiting his mother if he wants to.

Thanks. I needed a totally irrelevant unrelated anecdotal response from a random single representative of an entire population to make my data complete. While you may think the observable universe revolves around your individual minuscule life experiences and are therefore projectable upon all of humanity, I can assure you that is not the case.

Yes No. I think it should happen, but I don't think it needs to happen. If the father instructs who? While the mother is obligated to follow that law, she is not compelled to follow the father's instructions. Do we agree on this? If law requires the mother drag the child out to the car and deliver them to the husband against the child's will any time the husband instructs her to do so, then yes, that is not how I understand the law. How would you block her access in the future, if your boys were fifteen, and kept going to visit her on the way to school? So how is the issue solved without any cooperation from the mother? I do not doubt if the law requires the boy be dragged from the mother's home and returned to the father, the police will drag the boy from the mother's home and return him to the father. But how would that solve the issue? So, the plan is that after the cooling off period, the boy comes back and that's the end of it.

Right here: Magic perhaps If how many children do you have with your ex? If my wife was keeping my children from me, I think I might put a little effort into finding her, even if I had to walk door to door. Is the father abandoning the daughter because he does not know where the mother lives? But again, the father does know where the boy goes to school, why not pick him up there? But we can make an attempt. The boy is not going to abandon his mother, so she holds the cards. Maybe they will, but I just can't see the police dragging a crying boy out of his mother's home.

What do imagine the frequency of one versus the other is?

Yes, I have tried Mexican tacos. Are tacos made in Thailand Mexican tacos or Thai Tacos?

Or they'd have to make it longer and higher better writers....

Again, I do not see how the mother can be legally compelled to physically return the boy. That the OP does not know where the wife lives seems a bit suspect to me. She (apparently) lives on the way to the boy's school. Does the father not know where the boy goes to school? Why can't he pick him up there? If the OP truly cares about the kids (and I do not doubt he does) needs to bite the bullet, an get on reasonable terms with the Ex, whatever it takes.

I think the plots are okay, but they are poorly written, so too many holes.

I thought the story was good, I thought it was believable and I thought acting was great for the most part.

I simply can't understand how it can be considered acceptable for a kids to flee from the police to avoid prosecution. I do not think the policeman was justified, I think something went horribly wrong, but kids fleeing police without any fear of tconsequences does not end well for society.

And we have thermometers for there's c & f also.

Yeah, it's not really in the US, just a suburb,

I thought he implied that the "leftist media" was not reporting on it, to which (I think) you then claimed CNN was covering it. To me, your response implied you believed that CNN was left-biased, which surprised me, because I always assumed they were about as unbiased as possible.

CNN is left wing?

Yet when I asked: "How it is the mother or the son acting outside the law?" you responded with: "Legally, the father has custody of the son, it is not rocket science, even a fool can determine the answer to your question from my comments in this thread.". Now, apparently you cannot answer my question. The father has custody and is responsible for the boy, and there has been not talk of the mother taking from the boy from the father or holding the boy against his will or against the will of the father. Neither has there been talk of a restraining order against anyone. Why should the mother disallow the boy from visiting her, and why is it the mother's responsibility to physically return the boy to the father?

Okay, but I never said that inflation is not significant. I think I said it disproportionality hurt the poor, and that it did not significantly hurt the rich. That said, the exchange rate changes continuously. I remember it at 44/$ when I first came. It was weaker last October than it is today. If I knew how currencies were going change, guys like Mark Zukerburg would be shining my shoes...

Accuracy of you statement aside, what does that have to do with what I said?

Apparently, the son it is taking it upon himself to go see the mother. Does the father having custody mean that the mother is breaking the law by allowing her son to visit her in her home? The son has not been taken by the mother, nor is the son being held against his will, nor is there anything stopping the father from going and getting the boy. While I agree it's not "rocket science", I fail to see how the mother is breaking the law, and if that makes me a fool, so be it. Maybe a smart guy like you can explain it to me.

Apparently waving his pistol around....

I'd like to try it. Took the train once to Hua Hin and it derailed, they put us in vans, I lived on a train traveling with the carnival back in the '70s & '80s. You see a lot from the train you don't see from the road.

Foal?

The OP does not even know where the wife lives, and his boy drives past her soi on his way to school.

How will the poor be compelled to behave in a certain way if not with taxes?