Are you baiting me now or is this really that complex to you? I never said the link(s) did not support the facts. I did not (and still do not) know what facts the link was supposed to support. I did not and do not know what point Brian was trying to make.
Again, if I have no Idea what facts someone is trying to support, how am I supposed to know if the link supports the facts?
And having Harris as VP makes him stronger.
I'm guessing he ends up not running, and Kamala has to run (and lose) against Newsom and whomever else runs.
Not sure I qualify as a magadonian, but I do not think that Trump is above (or anyone) is above the law. But I do think that calling the January 6th protest/riot an insurrection is ridiculous.
You and others on the left don't. You guys think a bunch of morons with sticks and bottles were attempting to overthrow the government.
I think I've been renewing my CA DL online since the late '90s. Almost had to go in to renew as I was over sixty a few years ago, but the DMV was closed for covid so I got another five years...
My question was: The President is not supposed to be in charge of the federal government and bureaucracy?
Is it your position that the President is or is not supposed to be in charge of the federal government and bureaucracy?
Again, and I know how complex this must seem, but if I have no idea what claims someone is trying to support, how can I tell if the link they provide supports it?
A leftist (not you) claimed it was a lie that Biden got the guy investigating the company Hunter was on the board of fired.
I replied that there was a video of him bragging about it.
You are confirming that Biden did get him fired, so I'm not sure what you're on about.
To be clear, I assume it was likely just a coincidence that the guy Biden bragged about getting firing was investigating a Ukrainian company that Hunter was on the board of.
I think we are in agreement here.
Is it your position that Trump is using the campaign funds illegally?
Is he not now being "prosecuted" for using his own funds for paying off Stormy when he should have used campaign funds?
Thanks for the paywall tip.
If I do not know what someone is claiming are facts, how does getting though a paywall to look at their link going to help?
I think Brian was attempting to show that Trump donors were being deceived, I did not see how the articles he linked supported that position.
The bait and troll card, really?
The Post article you linked to seemed to indicate Trump needed money for his legal defense, is it your position that Trump does not need money for his legal defense?
I don't believe everything Trump says, any more than I believe everything Biden, Obama, or Clinton says.
Do you believe everything Biden, Obama, and Clinton says?