Chomper Higgot

What’s indefensible about putting ‘God before country’?

Although I’m not. The UK has a long and proud tradition of freedom of conscious.

I have a sneaky suspicion that the nasty people who keep these nasty dogs are already very aware of the danger they pose. What triggered ‘Rainbow armbands’ I wonder?

Maybe you could do a bit of research on the candidates and come up with them actually promoting violence or intolerance.

Seems even this couldn’t get past your need for grievance:

‘Atrocities’?

Can you point to the bit where Dr.Adrees promotes violence or intolerance for others.

A. The majority of Civilians in Gaza do not support Hamas. B. Ethnic cleansing and land grabs - I think you might have just said the quiet bit out loud.

What like, like these two, taking part in public life? Getting elected to represent their community? Working as Doctors in the NHS? Utterly disgraceful!

I’m sure you believe that to be true. But how does your belief on the matter relate to the two candidates, neither of whom are promoting violence or intolerance?

Let down by the guy who changed the system to address its failing?

Nasty dogs for nasty people. Maulings and deaths among same nasty people will be along shortly.

The concept of ‘God before country’ has a long history in Western Societies.

Oh look you’re patting yourself on the back but have not yet demonstrated the claims made in the Jerusalem Post to be incorrect.

Oh it was something someone said, an extrapolation. I thought for a moment it might be based on some credible and checkable data, maybe some research or data from police records. Who are these ‘friends of mine’ you refer to James?

Can you provide a link to 250,000+++ young white girls often children?

How would a Parliamentary inquiry impact people being imprisoned? The history of Parliamentary Inquiries resulting in prison sentences can be demonstrated by the fact that the Hillsborough, Contaminated Blood, Post Office and Grenfell inquiries resulted one single criminal imprisonment. There’s already been an inquiry, it was instigated by the last Tory Government which also set the terms of reference. I’ll make a prediction, if a second inquiry does take place, you’ll all be back here claiming that too is a cover-up or some other fanciful conspiracy.

Which was addressed in the Parliamentary Inquiry, instigated by the last Government.

Well I wouldn’t be surprised auto Musk pinching an idea of Farage and presenting it as his own. But it’s far more likely Farage simply isn’t far right enough for Musk. He doesn’t seem to understand Farage owns Reform UK, its members are subscribers, they have day in who the leader shall be.

Yaxley-Lennon is in prison because he committed ‘contempt of court’. End of.

I live in Thailand, I don’t pay council tax.

Have your taxes gone up? I pay tax in the UK, mine certainly hasn’t gone up.

I see the Space Karen has turned on Farage. Farage for once being right on the matter, Yaxley-Lennon is where he belongs.

I’m frequently in the UK, spent much of the past four years there, it’s always a pleasure to visit. I like the place. I don’t recall ever going to Islington.

I’ve already given the best one. There has already been an inquiry, I provided a link, refer earlier post. The Inquiries Act gives responsibility for setting the terms of reference for inquiries to the Prime Minister. Which begs a question. Has your departure from reality into the realms of conspiracy reached the point where a Tory PM would authorize an inquiry and set the terms of reference such as to hide any culpability on behalf of members of the Labour Party?