Chomper Higgot

You made a point?

If she’s telling the truth she has nothing to fear.

Like you and the ‘two tier town crier’ have been doing?

It’s quite straightforward John. Ms Pearson has made some categorical statements regarding her interaction with the police. She’s repeated these statements and her employer The Telegraph have published them. The police have countered Ms Pearson’s the statements with their own version of events, which they have stated are recorded on body camera. The police are so sure of their position that they have lodged a complaint against The Telegraph’s reporting with the Independent Press Standards Organization. The truth will out.

As a member of this forum I’m e turned to participate in any thread I wish. However, and please do take note, I am not the subject of any thread.

My bet would be to let the Independent Press Standards Organization deal with the matter. The police have lodged a complaint.

Neither did you James, you’ve been triggered since this ‘story’ broke. And it’s looking like a ‘whopper’ of a ‘story’.

Oh I don’t mind waiting for the whole story. Ms Pearson and the police have each given different t accounts of the incident, the police have body camera footage and have filed a press complaint. I have feeling the wait for the full story won’t be long now.

The police have made the following statement it’s a little problematic for Ms Pearson, doubly so since the police have also filed lodged a complaint with the Independent Press Standards Organisation (Ipso) regulator over the Telegraph's reporting of the incident. “At no stage during the short interaction between the woman and our officers was she informed that the report being investigated was being treated as a non-crime hate incident. To suggest otherwise is wholly inaccurate and misleading. “As the public would expect, we have body worn video of this interaction which entirely supports our position in this respect.” https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cev9nxnygzpo.amp

Which would only result in those on legal aid being discouraged from exercising their right to be held innocent until proven guilty by the prosecution . Let’s stick with the current innocent until proven guilty and the right to plead innocent without any pressure or duress to exercise that right.

“The force has since lodged a complaint with the Independent Press Standards Organisation (Ipso) regulator over the Telegraph's reporting of the incident. “ The police have also released a transcript from the attending officer’s body camera. Ms Pearson needs to get her story straightened out. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cev9nxnygzpo.amp

Racist slurs are not jokes or legitimate criticism.

Nothing to do with ‘Lefties’. The person responsible is the person committing the crime.

Let’s not carried away, as the 51st State the UK and its citizens would enjoy some rights. Vassal is more likely to be the offering.

Refer US / UK election timing. Trump will be gone before Labour.

I very long prison term, taking her past her own childbearing years with a lifetime ban from being in any unsupervised proximity to children would be a fitting sentence.

There is no two tier system Jonny and no amount of ripped memes doing your thinking for you will make it so.

I didn’t hear you complaining when during the last interim period the then incumbent attempted to over throw the election that ousted him.

Putting aside Mrs Beeton’s sage advice. I suggest reading the terms of any deal before declaring it ‘will suffice’.

When did I agree London was not diverse from an ethnic perspective?

I look forward to you providing examples of me posting ‘hate’.

Erm I’m on the left and I don’t hold that belief you invented. I don’t know anyone on the left who does.

I’m right behind the idea of all freedoms coming with responsibility. The law does govern online abuse, it has nothing to do with the hyperbole ‘press freedoms’.

It doesn’t concern me, I don’t post hate messages online.

Irony and introspection are dead.