-
Posts
37,242 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
39
Content Type
Events
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Gallery
Blogs
Everything posted by Chomper Higgot
-
Ignoring the fact that this election is being contested by a candidate who on multiple occasions has resorted to the rhetoric of fascism and the fact that multiple people who actually know Trump and served in his administration are warning of his fascism. It seems you are more concerned with the accusation of fascism than the credible threat of a fascist candidate we are all being warned of.
-
You should perhaps engage a bit more history and appraise yourself of the path to power taken by the Nazis, the early 1930s is a good place to start, you’ll find there much of the exact same rhetoric of hatred that Trump employs in his ‘rallies’.
- 27 replies
-
- 10
-
-
-
-
-
-
I’ve no idea. Neither do you. But I see you are back to misrepresenting the online criminal behavior that you have on multiple occasions been corrected on. What people ‘can do’ is not what the law says people ‘may do’, and as I have unequivocally stated above, I support due process in the admission of the law. It’s not difficult to do Jonny, you just have to go easy on your seething self stoke grievance. After-all, we neither of us know why the attacker has not been arrested, only one of us is eager to jump to conclusions, it’s a habit of yours.
-
Don’t take my word for it, here’s what the Judge had to say: Jailing Yaxley-Lennon for 18 months, Mr Justice Johnson said: “In a democratic society underpinned by the rule of law, court orders must be obeyed. “Nobody is above the law. Nobody can pick or choose which laws or which injunctions they obey, or which they do not. “Even if they believe that an injunction is... contrary to their views they must comply with the injunction. “They are not entitled to set themselves up as the judge in their own court. Otherwise the administration of justice and rule of law would break down.” https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c704eedkqkvo Your ‘Muslim at Manchester AirPort’ whataboutary is noted as the irrelevance it is.
-
By all means take that to court only to discover the background circumstances of the event, what was being said, what had preceded the assault. Much better to have that investigated prior to bringing charges and presenting those in court only to have the defense team reveal the details…. Don’t you agree?