Chomper Higgot

Sorry you don’t like the idea of traceability in journalism.

I’ve watched Trump speak. When he manages to do so without mumbling unintelligible sounds he’s engaging in lies, revisionism and hate mongering. Contrary to the arguments being made by many of Trump’s supporters, both foreign and domestic, I as a liberal am delighted to see Trump speaking to a wide ordinance, the more people who witness his cognitive decline and bitter vindictiveness the better. https://news.cornell.edu/media-relations/tip-sheets/cornell-expert-says-trumps-frequent-phonemic-paraphasia-are-signs-early

Or some random stranger on the Internet with a demonstrated bias would have us believe.

That’s obviously both an assertion and two assumptions on your part.

I’ve provided a link to a credible source that reports Rogan laughing at Trump’s response to Rohan’s question. Go ahead, deny the report from a credible source.

Georgia finds 20 alleged illegal voter registrations out of 8.2 million registrations. “[Georgia Secretary of State]Raffensperger said this year’s audit is the most comprehensive citizenship check ever conducted in Georgia. “ https://georgiarecorder.com/briefs/georgia-gop-secretary-of-state-reports-audit-found-20-noncitizens-registered-to-vote-out-of-8-2m/

You don’t seem to understand the past tense.

Harris is the more presidential of the two. Easy as that.

“Appears to be” And from your screenshot: “Potentially fraudulent “ AKA unproven allegations.

Random social media posts and GOP hack making allegations. This is not evidence, it’s grandstanding unproven allegations.

Oh, GOP campaign messaging.

But I didn’t provide a link to MSNBC, which demonstrates the fallacy of your argument.

In your biased opinion. Its nevertheless not evidence that she’s lying.

I don’t need to. I’m not the one calling Harris a liar.

It’s a credible link. That’s what it is. Which is why you can’t deal with it.

By all Trump supporter, both foreign and domestic, accounts.

No, if you accuse anyone of lying it’s for you to provide proof.

If you are going to accuse someone of lying then it is incumbent on you to prove they have lied

While Trump hides his academic record.

Here you go: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/joe-rogan-trump-podcast-stolen-election-b2636115.html

Let me guess, attempting to overthrow an election, inciting race hatred, stripping women of their rights, sucking up to tyrants, defending Putin and his illegal war?

Sorry but really ‘Hillary’. You’re living in the past.

Unpleasant things?

No she doesn’t have to. She can spend her time on more important matters. The problem arises when a candidate repeats claims that have been proven false on multiple occasions and when his supporters, both foreign and domestic choose to believe and parrot his bare faced lies.

It’s not usual at all. Lots of old folk behave this way, sit them down in a cumfy chair, give them a cup of tea and a biscuit and they ramble on for hours.