-
Posts
32,488 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Everything posted by Chomper Higgot
-
Posted by me 5 hours ago: And from the Wikipedia link you provided: “Co-founder Matthew Jamison, who now works for YouGov, wrote in 2017 that he was ashamed of his involvement, having never imagined the Henry Jackson Society "would become a far-right, deeply anti-Muslimracist ... propaganda outfit to smear other cultures, religions and ethnic groups". He claimed that "The HJS for many years has relentlessly demonised Muslims and Islam".[63]” what was that you said about ‘Educate yourself’?
-
Which is nowhere near the number who believe Israel are engaged in genocide in Palestine. A perfect example of biased reporting, think tanks and newspaper editors ignoring stuff that’s inconvenient to what they want their audience to read. Its even markedly less than the number of the general British Public who believe Israel is engaged in genocide in Palestine.
-
Opinion: What is Donald Trump's mental state?
Chomper Higgot replied to george's topic in World News
You have absolutely no idea what I have. I’d rather you spent less time fantasizing about me doing things in basements. -
Opinion: What is Donald Trump's mental state?
Chomper Higgot replied to george's topic in World News
We for sure he’s lost a lot of money. And we know he lies about how much money he has. -
Here’s how bias in reporting work. The HJ Society commissioned a survey of attitudes amongst British Muslims on a range of issues. The poll returns results amongst which the clear leader in terms of support for the view amongst British Muslims is an 80% believe Israel is committing genocide on Palestine. So the HRC Society write a report focussed on the attitudes and beliefs that have below 50% support amongst British Muslims and this gets distributed by the Telegraph and the Jewish Chronicle. That’s precisely how biased reporting works.
-
Unfortunately, to understand it’s necessary to start asking why. When a line is drawn on the day of a terrorist attack and discussion of any recent events or history before the attack is being negated then you can be assured that someone doesn’t want something to be known, discussed or understood. Why do I think …… So now you are asking me to examine the beliefs of others, perhaps I need to look at their own past history, their own background, events that took place before the survey. Though to be honest my first question would be is the survey/report reliable? And if it were reliable I’d ask were are these Muslims getting their information on what is happening in Gaza? It all goes back to the source and being able to ask questions.