Chomper Higgot

What like a lottery ticket might deliver you a millions?!

Who’s fault is that?

You don’t understand that facts are verifiable?!

My lot? But I do agree, let’s wait and see. None of this predicting the future HS.

But unfortunately for that line of ‘thought’ facts are verifiable.

You did, you dreamt up this idea that someone would come on holiday to Thailand and return to find an Albanian living I their house. Utter emotive nonsense.

I’ll try to remember that, and occasionally remind you of it.

I didn’t say ‘facts are pejorative’ I referred to your pejorative generalizations . Snd your need to twist a topic that is not about Muslims into a platform for you to engage in those generalized pejorative views.

Where’s the bit about someone going to Thailand for six months? Or even that a house-owner going on holiday changing the house status from occupied to vacant? You know, all the stuff that you dream up to avoid facing the fact that there are tens of thousands of empty homes across the country.

Do you have a link to that ever happening or is it some sort of emotive imagination of your??

I’ll let you have another crack at that, it’s so vague as to be meaningless. Are you asking me if all 100,000 asylum seekers are Muslim? If not how many? How many will actually have their applications approved? By now the problem with applying broad brush generalizations ought to be dawning on you. Have another go.

A contender for the hyperbole post of the month. Muslims constitute less than 6% of the population.

https://www.local.gov.uk/about/news/empty-homes-england-rise-nearly-10-cent-five-years

‘A political construct’. Or at least a claimed ‘political construct’ that fits your need to twist a thread that is not about Muslims into a platform for you to spout your pejorative on Muslims and Islam.

Oh, now your on your Muslim thing. We should have a thread on that.

Yet more false claims. Nobody has been given a free pass.

No he hasn’t. The Labour Government are going to process the claims in accordance with the law. Which is a positive change from the Tories failing to process claims and leaving both genuine and bogus asylum seekers sitting in limbo at tax payers expense.

Once again you come up with no evidence whatsoever to back your claim that Lammy was the beneficiary of positive discrimination. But he’s not Asian, he’s not White and he went to Harvard. More than enough for your hair trigger.

How so. Until last week the Tories were doing nothing about the backlog of asylum seekers while handing hundreds of £millions to Rwanda . This week Labour are dealing with the backlog and have put an end to the hugely expensive and failed Rwanda asylum seeker exchange scheme. All positive changes and kicked off in under a week.

Pure wildly generalized pejorative assumptions. No need to blame asylum seekers for the corruption and mendacity of a few Tories.

Again no evidence whatsoever. ‘Typically’, assumed grade equivalence, absolutely no consideration of Lammy’s work experience as an Barrister with international experience. But you have let your cat out of its bag. You’ve asserted without evidence that David Lammy did not meet the entrance requirements. You also stated that Harvard has been ordered by a court of law to cease discriminatory practices against Asian and White applicants. And there we have it. You don’t know on what basis David Lammy entered Harvard, so you assume that because he’s not White or Asian that he must have benefited from positive discrimination. Stop digging Jonny.

I’ll thank you to permit me to express my own opinions. No need for you to go inventing views I have never expressed.

Who “supports asylum for people with fake claims?” I have never once seen anyone on this forum support fake asylum claims.

My bad. FPTP has delivered a Government with a secure majority. Such outcomes were never a problem until the beneficiary was a Labour Government.

It could have been worse, you could have given a load of cash to an old school chum for nothing in return, and told your gf she’s got to pay it back over the next twenty five years, and in the meantime she’s getting no money for health care.