Chomper Higgot

I brought science to the debate, brought your fixation with other people’s genitalia and came without your reading glasses.

My stance is to believe what science and medical professionals have to say on the matter. I have already provided links which you choose to dismiss and you very clearly did not read the NHS information I linked. You on the other hand claimed scientific facts but refuse to accept science when it is presented. Here’s the NHS link again, you might want to read what it has to say. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/differences-in-sex-development/#:~:text=Some people have a chromosome,full physical development at puberty.

This has gone beyond hypocrisy, taken a swerve past irony and landed smack in the middle of farce. My ears are still ringing from the rightwing screaming against ‘Defund the police’.

I’ll go with what the science and the NHS have to say on the matter. The stuff you ignore.

Having made this statement “Her views are not controversial, they are scientific facts.” And then presented with the science on the matter which demonstrates the fallacy of your claim, you the go on the attack the source of the science and ignore the medical facts presented by the NHS on the matter. Well of course you do. Admitting you were wrong in the face of facts isn’t something we expect.

Toxic narcissist and Putin Operative is my take on this crook.

I’m looking forward to hearing what the sentencing recommendations have to say.

Habba was right, the histrionics has already started. When Trump eventually does wind up behind bars, and that day will come, he could interestingly calm the gum gnashing of his supporters by declaring g he’s not in prison. The people who believed he didn’t commit the crimes he very clearly did commit. Refused to accept he would be indicted. Refused to accept he would go to trial. Refuse to accept the indictments. Refused to accept witnesses and evidence. Refused to accept the jury. Refused to accept the verdict. They’ll have problem at all accepting Trump isn’t in prison, he only has to give the word. All the rest of us have to do is wait to see which judge puts him in which prison and for how long.

I’m not going to waste any time at all trying to figure out by what tortured part of thought that arrived.

I suspect taking a lead from something that works might be a good idea: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13624806231208432#:~:text=Through a programme of direct,health' approach to violence reduction.

Her influence over the assailants in this obscene attack on an innocent child is?

Science and facts that proved you wrong.

Excellent post. Links as follows : https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/differences-in-sex-development/#:~:text=Some people have a chromosome,full physical development at puberty.

The internet is a wonderful thing, one can find information and broaden one’s knowledge. Or alternatively one can use it to proclaim one’s ignorance to the world: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Muslim_Nobel_laureates

I’ve posted my views on this obscene attack and the harassment that preceded, refer my first comment in the thread. You’ll find I have stated very clearly who I believe to hold responsibility and accountability for this atrocity. Forgive me for not joining you in using the hate that lead to this child’s suffering as a cause to promote other forms of hatred.

She’s had bit more to say on the matter than that.

No need to ‘sue’ you Jonny. Just responding to your ill-informed statements about what ‘science’ says with links to what science actually says from one of the world’s to universities.

Oh, do your off topic Dianne Abbott thing wasn’t at all necessary and added nothing to the discussion. Who knew?!

Sorry for calling out your claims of men being victims in all of this. So your opinion is that the woman gets to choose whether to kill their unborn child or not, but the man has no say in that or whether he wishes to pay to raise their child after the woman has made her decision about whether to allow the life of their unborn child to continue? Correct? Seems a bit lop sided to me.

That’s rather a blunt statement Jonny, I have a suspicion it’s ill-informed. https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2016/gender-lines-science-transgender-identity/

I wonder if J K Rowling read the Communist Party’s policy on Transgender issues?

Refer to thread on increased child mortality and birth defects in Texas. You bleating about how hard done by men are is not ‘feminist rhetoric’, it’s self stroked grievance wallowing.

The number of infant deaths rose from 1,985 to 2,240, representing a 12.8 percent increase, compared to a 1.8 percent increase across the rest of the United States during the same period. Well so much for the ‘Pro-Life’ argument’ The study also highlighted a notable rise in congenital anomalies in Texas, which increased by 22.9 percent, contrasting sharply with a 3.1 percent decrease in such cases across the rest of the country. The Rightwing Christian alliance just keeps giving.

False equivalence and whataboutary all in one short sentence.

Nothing to do with ‘Dianne Abbot’ Jonny.