Chomper Higgot

We’ve discussed the why’s at length elsewhere Brian, they are not the topic here. But I get your point, the carnage should just continue under the cover of shouting Antisemitism at anyone who protests. As I said earlier, Josh Levs has given us a perfect example of how media is manipulated. Just count the articles.

Clearly not a fan of democracy then Jonny. And clearly eager to promote your usual false narrative.

Brian ‘There is carnage’. People inside Israel and around the world are protesting to stop the carnage.

Classic avoiding the fact that carnage is underway now, it’s the ongoing carnage people are protesting about. Tens of thousands of civilians killed, the carnage on going, people very rightly protesting; response, flood the media with articles on Antisemitism.

I haven’t.

How so. I’ve discussed it at length in the threads in which it is the topic of discussion. I have consistently referred to the Hamas attack as obscene terrorism, I have consistently stated the taking and holding, killing and abuse of hostages is a war crime and that the hostages must be released, the bodies of dead hostages must be returned to their families. Absolutely no denial of any of these obscenities on my part, rather consistent condemnation of these heinous acts. But non of this is the subject under discussion.

We should have a thread on that.

Wedging your Sadiq Khan fixation into the topic Jonny. He’s the thrice elected, with increasing popularity, mayor of London, nothing to do with Malmo whatsoever. However, I do accept he does follow you around topics you post on, regardless of what the topic might be.

It’s not the topic of discussion. Just an example of how some folks just can’t stay off their hate mongering.

Once again we are seeing expressions of hatred in this thread from the usual sources.

Josh Levs gives us a perfect example of how this works. Israel wages war in Gaza killing tens of thousands of innocent civilians. Flood the media with talk of antisemitism. Just count the articles.

Arguably the most glaring false equivalence I’ve read on here in a long time.

I’d go easy on religious heritage of hate and terror if I were you., it might give rise to examination of who holds the trophy on that. But thank you, you have said the quiet bit out loud. There is a clear link between those supporting the ongoing carnage in Gaza and their own post history on Muslims and Islam. You’ve given us an example.

I said at the very start of this war that we are soon to learn how many eyes for an eye and teeth for a tooth.

What like racially abusing and sexually harassing people?

There’s a lot of anxiety driven anger coming from the Defendant ’s supporters in this thread. Chill guys, if you really believe the Defendant will be acquitted you’ve no need for all the histrionics .

Stormy Daniels isn’t the defendant, the real defendant’s legal team have been given the opportunity to question her testimony. Does Hope Hicks hate the Defendant? She certainly stuck the knife right in.

I doubt very much Daniels is the first witness in a criminal trial who hates the defendant. I’d go as far as to say it’s probable not at all unusual.

That aged well: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/may/08/marjorie-taylor-greene-speaker-mike-johnson-motion-to-vacate

Frontal lobe?

Stormy Daniels has provided evidence of motive. Had she not testified Trump’s defense team would argue the alleged cover-up is a fabrication on the grounds that nothing has been shown that needed covering up.

I’m absolutely certain you won’t accept the verdict if he is.

Feel free to point out examples of me using offensive language. I don’t need to denigrate any of the witnesses or the defendant.

That’s not entirely true. Defense lawyers exposing a Prosecution witness lying under oath is a very effective means of destroying the case against their client.

It’s a possibility. If possible I’ll watch the verdict announced on FOX. I think it’s a fair balance between the risk of disappointment and the reward of an exquisitely enjoyable FOX reaction.