Chomper Higgot

No my post that James quoted was not misinformation, at the time I posted it was correct. Right now the connection to Islamic terrorism is possession of terrorist material from an Islamist terrorist group. No motivation has been given. So let’s stick with the information we have.

How so?

It seems all it takes these days is for you to assert an identity.

It’s nevertheless an example of misinformation.

How is that misinformation? It’s a question that was consistent with the available information at the time of asking.

Who was jailed for spreading misinformation?

He’ll shortly be banging on about crowd size, he’s too easily baited.

Which I guess is why Trump’s supporters, both foreign and domestic, have been spewing vitriol at her.

Racist comments about immigrants, and fear mongering seem to be the go to.

Well it might fall flat with Piers Morgan (not an American and hence not a voter), but at least he had the ear of the NYP and Trump supporters, both foreign and domestic.

Trump’s team might have ‘distanced themselves’ from the racism presented, to the delight of the MAGA audience, at Trump’s MSG Rally, however Trump has not. Turning up late for a press conference he himself called he avoided the issue entirely. It’s a massive home goal and a gift to the Democrats: https://www.politico.com/news/2024/10/29/donald-trump-puerto-rico-press-conference-00186043 The infighting has commenced: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna177925

What even FOX?

The Telegraph are obviously not looking forward to the budget. News of a 6.7% increase in the minimum wage is perhaps an indication that this Government has pivoted away from a sector of society The Telegraph feels is the rightful recipient of Government care and attention, or at least not the care and attention The Telegraph wishes to see. Tomorrow we’ll have an opportunity to talk about actual Government policies rather than opinions The Telegraph itself plays a party in manipulating.

Yes, that is how the law sees it.

Is this the ‘wet bar of soap’ argument? Or just general switching to yet more whataboutary?

Could not me clearer, thank you: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/in-general#:~:text=You use in general to,More Synonyms of in general

Oh so when you said ‘The Left’ you were not referring to ‘The Left’ you were referring to some unidentified part of ‘The Left’. Gotchya.

You did read the OP?

And useful idiots will defend Russia as it does so.

I see she’s got your attention. I expect many more are listening to her too.

Oh: ’the left’?

Where is your evidence he is above the law? He has already been interviewed by the police, an investigation is clearly underway.

It must difficult for you being the only person knowing the truth and with no need for science, evidence or proofs.

While you only refer to ‘the whole of the left’.

So science is a thing of the left.