Chomper Higgot

I’m simply pointing out FOX is engaging in diversion.

As I’ve suggested earlier, maybe AI has a broader view.

I’ve never told my father what I earn nor have I ever asked my children about their incomes. I do tell my kids, just like my father told me, file your incomes honestly and pay your taxes. Not knowing what one’s children earn or where they earn it isn’t a crime. I see from the article Hunter did indeed report his income.

You are correct, the FOX article in the OP is an attempted diversion.

Is that the bit where you try to make me the topic of discussion?

Well if the GOP refuse to grow a set, leaving it to the SCOTUS to decide if a totally unviable candidate is what the GOP should offer the nation is I suppose their last hope of finding someone else to take responsibility for the mess the GOP have walked into.

It seems there’s more to be investigated: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/aug/19/lucy-letby-police-urged-to-investigate-hospital-bosses-for-corporate-manslaughter

The bad rap farang English teachers have in Thailand. Do they deserve it?

What you are thinking is proxy punishment by prisoners.

I think his fantasy of revenge is a more accurate description.

I’m not a fan of contracting out criminal Justice to criminals and I very much doubt Rampton or Broadmoor are anything like an ‘easy sentence’.

Rampton or Broadmoor would be the best place for her.

Orange suits her.

And Republican witnesses.

It cuts both ways.

Nobody is denying Trump the assistance of counsel for his defense. Though he does have a habit of selecting counsel barely able to do the job.

He might as well just come out and say it, he believes himself to be above the law and should never be called to answer for his actions. Drag the spoiled brat into court on the date already set, kicking and screaming if necessary.

27 to 33 years in the slammer is fair. Seditious conspiracy is a serious crime. They’ll be broken old men by time they see freedom again, if they make it that long. Good enough.

You ask what the implication is and then launch into accusations of conspiracy and corruption.

Just follow the law: https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-628-speedy-trial-act-1974 And the Sixth Amendment: ”In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed…..

LOL

22 years is fair. She clearly intended harm, targeted the then President and putting all in the delivery postal chain at risk.

If you state a number, it’s for you to demonstrate that number is correct or provide a link to a credible source for that number. You don’t get to make claims then assert its for others to prove you wrong.

OK so you were wrong. Facebook constitutes a great deal more of the internet than you baselessly assumed.

There’s nothing subjective about what constitutes a lie.