Chomper Higgot

Well an aversion to verifiable sources seems a pretty good reason.

That’s a very odd question for you to ask.

One or more of which now have very good cause to sing like a canary.

The pushback against the Hunter Biden evidence void allegation confession thing has started. Pretty boy Kushner isn’t going to like it.

That’s like saying a tangled parachute has not yet failed because the parachutist hasn’t yet splatted on the ground.

Or providing links to back up statements presented as facts.

Someone let you teach their kids? No surely not.

You said this: Snd yet when asked for links to this so called ‘evidence’ duck, dive and slither. Links to this evidence you say ‘is in the media, every day’, please. Shouldn’t be too hard for you to provide that which you say exists.

The basis of critical thinking is the examination of information. You make unsubstantiated statements and others make the critical observation that your claims are unsupported. Rather than provide links to the media reports you claim exist you resort to personal attacks. And now you bring up ‘critical thinking’. Irony lives.

This isn’t a pub, it’s a news discussion forum. If you are going to make statements purporting to be facts you either provide a link to back them up or they are not substantiated. Refer to top of the forum: ”Any alleged factual claims must be supported by a valid link to an approved credible source.”

No need for personal attack. All you have to do is back up claims you make.

Forgive me for calling you out on the claims you made but can’t back up.

Then you’ll not have a problem linking them and explaining what you think they are saying.

No, but are they admissible? If my laptop went missing for months, was handled by countless people and then ‘stuff’ was found on its hard drive I’d be making to obvious observation that the laptop was handled by countless people. Don’t tell me you wouldn’t make the same observation if it were you. In the case of the subject laptop, numbers of these people were affiliated with Trump and or the Republican Party. I smell a lot of accusation confession going on.

Evidence?

And when legionnaire bacteria was discovered one might expect it to be dealt with before transferring people into the barge: https://www.messengernewspapers.co.uk/news/national/23720228.council-says-home-office-contractors-told-legionella-day-barge-transfer/

I’ll cut out the ‘could be’ and rely on multiple court rulings that there was no election fraud. AKA lies.

Well they can say it, but they never bring any credible evidence that any court will accept. AKA lies.

Let’s stick with what we know. Labour are not in Government, nor are they the topic of discussion. This ‘immigrant barge’ Hokey Cokey, is a failure of the current Government’s own making, at tax payers expense and Government chum’s profit. You shouting ‘Labour’ does not alter any of that.

Nice unverifiable story.

Oh, the countries people flee from. What an aspiration for a nation to aim for.

That’s a wild claim. Do you have evidence of a country failing to control illegal immigration until it removed itself from the 1948 Declaration of Human Rights.

Nobody is claiming it is.

Someone pointing a gun at a law enforcement officer is a credible threat to the law enforcement officer.

Because people known to be in possession of fire arms who are making threats of violence are zero threat to officers issuing warrants.