Chomper Higgot

I believe there’s at least one thread on that particular subject. He’s been suspender see from the Labour Party, refer first sentence of the OP that is the actual topic of discussion.

I don’t think Rightwing Christians prepping for the Rapture have a finger on the big button, well not yet anyway.

The question is, does Starmer deal with Trump and offer him the fealty he demands, in the hope that Trump will remove the sanctions and not engage in some other form of economic warfare? Or does Starmer deal with the far bigger problem of the new economic, trade, defense and diplomatic reality that Trump has crated? There never was any special relationship between the U.S. and the UK, it was always a self deception on the party of the British, but the U.S. was a reliable economic, trade, diplomatic and defense partner, that is no longer the case.

It’s a shakedown. He’ll remove the tariffs when he receives to fealty he demands. Be that from nations or the Snetican Corporations the tariffs harm.

The ‘merit’ being who her dad is.

I don’t think there’s any need to add to the endless stream of sullen victimhood and grievance mongering. Where no actual grievance exists, they can always be invented. Refer above for yet more examples.

He who fights then runs away, lives to fight another day.

It’s also because many of Thailand’s large businesses are family owned or controlled by families.

So the U.S. puts tariffs on imports from Thailand and you think Thailand is going to reduce trade with China. Trade will take the path of least resistance. There’s a clue in the OP:

Investigate, charge, send him to trial and if found guilty lock him up. Which is yet again evidence of how long it takes for sexual crimes to come to light.

Bit of a false equivalence. Manslaughter is an unintended killing, there is nothing unintentional about rape. Find a more worthy hill to die on.

Well for a start, they only think they know the reason. The reason(s) will be presented to a jury in an open court of law.

Russel Brand is charged with rape. That’s not ‘a minor allegation’ even if wedded to your feeble attempt to wedge your off topic fixations into the thread.

He saw there was a market for conspiracy theories and cashed in.

And yet another conspiracy.

Correct.

And the next conspiracy starts as easily as that.

He’s being arraigned at Westminster Magistrates Court. His trial will be in a Crown Court: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/Protocols/listing_crown_court_manual_050705.pdf

Let the jury hear the evidence and we’ll get to see what is and is not phony.

I see the subtle but important distinction evaded you.

The police press release indicates several accusers. https://news.met.police.uk/news/russell-brand-charged-by-the-metropolitan-police-service-495944

You are struggling today Lou. ’Potential’ money extraction by filing a police complaint. That would be short cut to prison. If you have evidence of any of his accusers attempting to extract money in the basis of the allegations they have laid against Brand send it to both the Met and Brand’s legal team. Careful though with the police, filing a false claim risks criminal prosecution.

I described the justice I know he deserves and support him receiving. I have made absolutely no comment on what the outcome of that justice will be. Nor shall I until the verdict is passed down.

And do the conspiracy nonsense starts.

They are no longer ‘allegations’ they are now ‘criminal charges’. There is a subtle but important distinction.