Chomper Higgot

The prisons were over crowded back in May before rightwing racist rioters and online hate mongers were being very rightly arrested, charged and found guilty of their crimes. A swift revision of your argument once its flaws have been pointed out you. Please name this martyr of yours so we can check the court reports to sew what he was actually jailed for. That you don’t see any racism is evidence of something but not evidence that she is not a racist. “She has been charged with publishing written material which was threatening, abusive or insulting intending thereby to stir up racial hatred or having regard to all the circumstances, whereby racial hatred was likely to be stirred up, contrary to section 19 of the Public Order Act 1986.” https://www.cps.gov.uk/cps/news/woman-charged-publishing-material-intending-stir-racial-hatred

While swerving on the fact that the underlying problem is longstanding prison over crowding, you did notice the rapist is male and the racist is female?

So not because a vile racist has been placed in remand having been found guilty of inciting race hatred, but because the UK’s prisons are over crowded. A problem that predates the current Government: https://www.theguardian.com/society/article/2024/may/09/government-crisis-measure-prison-overcrowding

Completely consistent with sowing conflict and confusion.

Do you have a link to that particular decision? A link to the actual decision, not the allegation of the decision?

For the record Jonny. I think child rapists should be imprisoned too. A pity someone sad idle for over a decade while the UK’s prison population grew to the point of over fill. Maybe more prisons should have bed. Built before the overfill occurred.

In the Lucy Letby thread would be my guess.

Not happy then that a self confessed racist is facing gaol for having engaged in online hate mongering.

Observing Putin’s actions is a better guide to what he’s up to.

This won’t go down well with Trump supporters, both foreign and domestic, but it will be heard by moderate Conservatives who value democracy, law & order and the Constitution. Trump failed to get the support of significant numbers of registered Republicans during the primaries, Cheney is speaking directly to those people.

And in response ‘US Conservative broadcasters’ are rushing to claim they were unwitting victims of the misinformation they were broadcasting on Russia’s behalf. I’m not sure claiming to be a useful (for profit) idiot is an admissible defense. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2024/sep/04/trump-harris-biden-campaign-election-updates?filterKeyEvents=true#filter-toggle-mobile

Long ramble short. Trump thinks God believes in Trump.

It seems you didn’t read the OP you are discussing either. Had you done so you might have spotted this, I’ve underlined the bit that answers your question: ”Connolly’s post, which openly called for violence against migrants, included the statement, “If that makes me racist, so be it,” showing her willingness to accept the label in pursuit of herinflammatory views. “

It comes in where it matters. https://www.cps.gov.uk/cps/news/woman-charged-publishing-material-intending-stir-racial-hatred

So it’s not an excuse for her behavior. Why is it at all relevant? The court ruling is widely reported, including in the OP to this thread.

How does any of that excuse her behavior?

Yes I do. Her own words, in the court records, you know the stuff you wish to ignore. If you feel you have a viable defense you are too late. However, that doesn’t negate the question, why on earth do you feel the need to defend this self. confessed racist?

A whole crock of mixed up hyperbole allegations and absolutely nothing whatsoever to go with the crime this woman chose to commit.

It’s terrible isn’t it, one can no longer incite burning people alive in buildings. What’s the world coming to I wonder.

We should perhaps have a tread in that.

With respect to anything in this thread, what is this ‘Truth as laid down by the “Blessed Kier”’ you refer to? Give it your best go.

The court, and the law disagrees with you.

Completely off topic whataboutary. Or maybe not, perhaps the whole justice system should grind to a halt until every single case is investigated and prosecuted in the exact time sequence in which they occur. Funny how these objections arise when the actual vase under discussion is an extreme right winger being held accountable under the law for vomiting racist incitement to burn a hotel full of people.

What on earth are you on about?

But but but… whatabout.