Chomper Higgot

They like a border problem, it’s a handy distraction for MAGA while Republicans get on with the serious business of handing the nation’s wealth to themselves and the already hyper wealthy.

Your confusing righting fiction for facts. While you are here, did Mexico ever pay up?

Johnson gave up his U.S. citizenship. He can run his lying mouth but he can’t vote and he can’t donate to the Trump campaign or the Republican Party.

So who’s blocking Federal funding for border security? https://www.thirdway.org/blog/republican-efforts-to-defund-border-security

Maybe, maybe not. Eitherway, doesn’t get Trump off the hook.

Non sequitur.

Last Tuesday Trump went on a rant fest against Carroll, posting online attacks through the wee hours of the night. Carroll’s lawyers promptly entered those posts in court as evidence of yet more defamation of Carroll by Trump. Trump was back at it yesterday, posting over 40 times in an hour, and once again Carroll was the focus of his unhinged ranting. Look out for these attacks by Trump to also be entered as evidence against him. https://www.forbes.com/sites/anafaguy/2024/01/22/trump-attacks-e-jean-carroll-in-more-than-40-posts-on-truth-social/amp/

Well that clears up who’s money it was that was being spent.

It provides back up to my statement regarding Willis’ filing. Do keep up.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/politics/fani-willis-accuses-a-special-prosecutors-estranged-wife-of-interfering-with-trump-election-case

You are overlooking a detail in Willis’ filing in the divorce case. Her legal team have laid out the basis of criminal conspiracy on the part of the divorcing couple. I look forward to her filing on Feb 2, I expect to hear more of this ‘criminal conspiracy’, you should too.

In which way are they ridiculous?

Feel free to counter the argument I made.

Trump’s lawyer has been exposed to COVID. https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4421484-e-jean-carroll-trial-trump-lawyers-covid/amp/

‘Mechanics of the case’? The divorce court judge will examine if Willis has an argument to negate the subpoena that calls for her testimony, Willis has made compelling arguments to court in her filing. The criminal court judge will examine if the allegations have any legal bearing on the criminal case and if they present evidence of the defendant’s rights having been infringed. The accuser has made a very weak argument with zero grounds or evidence of his rights to a fair trial having been infringed.

You need to go back to law school, or calm your hyperbole, which might be more difficult but definitely cheaper.

“Impropriety” Alleged “impropriety”. As you accept, the allegations have no legal bearing in the case Willis is prosecuting.

The allegations are alleged to be criminal. Until investigated they remain mere allegations. Of course the allegations themselves may have been made with criminal intent, refer Willis’ filing.

The issue is whether or not the allegations are being made to intimidate the AG and interfere with the prosecution she is fronting. As mentioned in her filing to the court.

Evidence to back up your slur?

And stop once the baby is delivered.

Short form for saying the allegations against Willis have no legal bearing on the case she’s prosecuting.

Of course he did. The wife needs to get better legal advice, she’s being played by her coconspirators.

What’s not to hate?

Well ‘an opinion’ is one of those things we all have. I doubt you could give an accurate definition of a Marxist without first looking it up.