Chomper Higgot

See you in November

Thanks for demonstrating precisely why the teaching of the history of British imperialism needs improving.

I’ll make you a promise. I’ll not make any statements claiming the 2024 election was stolen. Because, like the 2020 election, it won’t be.

I can’t wait. And I’ll be watching on FOX News to heighten the pleasure.

Yes, so when another poster claims Carroll will negotiate the damages during the appeal, do you pick up that nonsense are you only interested in the ‘Trump’s going to get away with it all’ narrative?

Hope springs eternal.

Correct, he said it plainly, ‘there is no do over’.

Were about to find out if that is indeed true or not.

Nevertheless it’s capital Trump has to stump up and cannot access while in escrow. Next week he gets to hear how much NY is going to force him to disgorge. These aren’t wins for Trump by any stretch of the imagination, your attempts to paint them orherwise are noted.

That’s a very weak argument given the fact what is arguably the most secure border on the planet didn’t stop an obscene terrorist attack. You’ve just pointed at the very best example of borders and walls not working.

Care to provide the legal basis for that claim?

The kind of garbage that got Trump into court in the first place.

If. In the meantime Trump has to stump up another $83.3Million.

Got a problem with the rule of law Jonny, or is just the bit where Trump gets held to account for his actions you don’t like?

Is that the ‘Liquid Gold Popcorn’? And don’t drop your crystal ball, you might shatter your delusions.

Next question. Is any of the abuse and defamation brought to the second trial independent of the ruling from the first? Or more precisely, does any of the myriad defamations uttered by Trump against Carroll stand as defamation in their own right?

OK so waiting for the first appeal ruling is not grounds to appeal the second.

I understand all that, but it wasn’t my question.

Just keep sending your $

So since you are giving tutorials on the law, answer me this: 1. During appeal does the ruling that is appealed still stand?

Hope springs eternal.

Trump’s attorney, who I suspect is his latest grip, concocted an absolutely shameful closing argument that was nothing less than pure victim blaming. Arguing that Trump’s victim brought the abuse and defamation upon herself by failing to stop complaining about the abuse and defamation. A clear confirmation that the abuse and defamation were intended to silence Trump’s victim and would continue until Trump’s victim was silent. The judge followed that twisted logic by pointing out it an argument with zero legal backing and Trump’s victim has a constitutional right to speak. Truthful speech is protected under the 1st Amendment , lies are not.

I wonder, have you have checked the top of this thread to inform yourself of the topic you are discussing?

Adherence to the Constitution should be the priority.

My coffee tastes unusually good this morning.