Chomper Higgot

What do the court records say?

Brace for incoming misogyny and thinly veiled racism. It’ll be along as soon as the ‘talking points’ have been handed down.

What bit of ‘There is no Cult of Biden’ do you not understand?

Just keep telling yourself that.

Sadly not Clacton.

Has she tried it?

Yep, Election 2024 former prosecutor v Convicted Felon. Trump’s supporters didn’t think about the consequences before ranting for Biden to step down.

Next up, who does Harris pick for her running mate. My choice would be Mark Kelly or Andy Beshear. Either of whom would rip Vance a new one. The upcoming Candidate Debates are going to be wonderful.

Since you mention gaslighting. Trump’s whole ‘dementia’ attacks on Biden kicked off and continued in the aftermath of Trump being rushed in the middle of the night to the Walter Reid Memorial Hospital to be administered the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test. Biden withdrawing has now removed the possibility of Trump hiding his own clearly collapsing brain by pointing at his opponent.

You forgot to mention Women’s rights, minority rights, workers rights, the separation of powers, Democracy and the rule of law.

I look forward to hearing who the Democrat line-up will be.

Correcting you. Trump is a convicted felon.

Cult? There is no Cult of Biden, no Democrat Cult.

I wonder when someone is jailed for years over protesting something you agree with?

Yet more ill informed nonsense from the font of ill informed nonsense. US courts and government inquiries have a long and well established precedence of transcripts or oral testimony being admissible as evidence without any resort to the actual taped discussion from which the transcripts are derived. Transcripts of evidence being admissible have a history that predates even your habit of being ill informed.

Welcome back to the thread Jonny. Have you managed to find a link to substantiate the statement you made earlier, or will you retract the statement? I’ve underlined the specific statement that you made and that you now need to substantiate. You made this statement, now back it up or do the right thing and retract it:

You mean ‘how about some whataboutary’?!

That’s the message the Daily Express wanted you to absorb. Well done.

Out of your own mouth, and nobody forced you.

Don’t waste time or effort on that, it’s not the topic of discussion.

And you are engaging in baseless speculation, which you choose to be of a pejorative nature.

Whatever it is that’s making you miserable today Transam, it’s not my fault. Once you grasp that you’ll not waste anymore time with your baseless personal attacks.

Obviously you have some kind of delusion going on. Not ‘my friends’, I’m not ‘protecting’, I, nor anyone I know ‘let anyone into the UK’, I don’t ‘want more’, I don’t ‘want to bring down the British way of life’, I’m not ‘anti-Brit’ and my nationality is non of your business. Enoch was not 100% right and I’m not 100% wrong.

My friends transam? If you have information on who torched the bus contact the Police, but don’t do so if you are simply dreaming up wild and baseless speculation.

Jonny, do you have a link to the underlined statement?