Jump to content

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    37,490
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    39

Everything posted by Chomper Higgot

  1. Where did I even suggest I supported such a thing? I did not. Go easy on the coffee.
  2. Very pro Government controlling citizens life choices.
  3. You perhaps assume English Common Law is universal.
  4. Well the current GOP certainly does.
  5. Actually they always have been. Pre-atrial incarceration is a thing.
  6. I’d be surprised if you had even heard of Mike Johnson before today, I suspect you’ve a bit of catching up to do. Oh and what triggered your totally off topic Antifa nonsense?
  7. It’s rather fitting that a rightwing extremist should be handed the tail of the rabid GOP tiger. A Republican mess that will not be resolved by a guy with zero political capital in the party. He’s going to be eaten alive.
  8. Having gone through life never facing any accountability then being put in the stand and schooled by a judge must of hurt. I advise the court not to accept a personal check for payment of the fine.
  9. Performance art for an audience of one. With Trump getting a slap for running his mouth against a court clerk. Seeing Trump on the stand in front of a judge reading Trump the law must have been a wonderful sight.
  10. AmericaFirstPolicy.com and Newsbusters bog. I’d like to think you were tying to have a laugh.
  11. I’m rather looking forward to the laws relating to Bankruptcy coming into play sometime shortly after Trump is handed his penalty.
  12. It think that comes under the statute of whataboutary.
  13. Rather than keeping through hoops to try and get reality to fit your viewpoint, read the relevant law (the law applied in the case), in particular Section 12.
  14. What matters is who submitted the ‘fraudulent’ valuations. Submitting a false valuation is Fraud, it becomes fraud at the very moment of submission, absolutely nothing to do with whether the loan is paid. The submissions have been ruled by the court as fraud.
  15. Since you mention the law, here it is, Section 12 applies and has been applied: https://codes.findlaw.com/ny/executive-law/exc-sect-63/
  16. Which has zero bearing on what Meadows’ lawyer chose to say and chose not to say.
  17. Valuations are black and white records. Arithmetic is not subjective.
  18. The financial system is the injured party, fraud undermines trust in and the credibility of the how finance functions and is governed. There is a difference between subjective error and criminally fraudulent valuation. The court has already determined criminal fraud. Sure this ought to be basic knowledge for a bank executive.
  19. The wording of the statement by Meadows’ lawyer is interesting, not for what it says, but for what it doesn’t say. It’s a long way from a categorical denial that Meadows has cut an immunity deal. Why so reticent? If an immunity deal hasn’t been cut just say so. I’m sure Meadows doesn’t appreciate having a MAGA target pinned to his back by suspicion that he’s cooperating with Jack Smith against Trump.
  20. One more By-Election should just about do it. https://amp.theguardian.com/politics/2023/oct/24/labour-prepares-to-force-byelection-if-tory-mp-peter-bone-suspended
  21. You are a former bank executive and you are unaware that making false statements on valuations to a bank in order to obtain a loan is in and of itself fraud. That the loan payments are made has no bearing on the matter.
  22. It might well be, but not because it’s not on Al Jazeera.
  23. It doesn’t have to be true. But I rather hope it is.
  24. Oh, it was only a few £million, never mind then. Did you happen to look at the £billions handed out with no benefit to the nation?
  25. Oh, you are back to inventing and attributing to me points of view I myself never expressed. Feel free to provide a quote from me where I state that winter is the fault of Government.
×
×
  • Create New...