Chomper Higgot

And as evidence and testimony against Trump are presented to the court and the cameras your lawyer can sit at the back of the court room and say nothing. Trump will not be represented as these evidence and testimony are written into the court records and the public discourse.

“Powell pleaded guilty to six misdemeanor counts of conspiracy to commit interference with election duties. She was sentenced to six years’ probation, a $6,000 fine, $2,700 in restitution to the state, and is required turn over documents and testify truthfully in her co-defendants’ trials.” https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/oct/19/sidney-powell-guilty-plea-trump-georgia-elections

That’s what happens when Trump supporters have the fever on them.

He’s no longer protected behind hundreds of NDA that have just been overturned by Jessica Denson’s case against him. https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2023/10/12/trump-ndas-scrapped-hundreds-of-2016-campaign-staffers-can-now-publicly-criticize-him-as-court-finalizes-settlement/amp/

No the speaker does not have to be a sitting member of Congress. Article 1. Section II, Clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States: https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/article-1/section-2/clause-5/#:~:text=Clause 5 Impeachment,the sole Power of Impeachment.

But definitely not one of those snowflakes who posts on the forum but blocks other members who counter his arguments.

Pinned.

I mist ‘The Famous Six’ and ‘The Famous Seven’. Did Julian, Dick, Anne, George and Timmy the dog ever discover the EU hypocrisy you allege but can’t explain?

The ‘famous 8’. Is that an Enid Blyton sequel?

I don’t need links for my opinions, I only need to produce links if I state something as being a fact. I very clearly stated my opinion. You on the other hand made this statement: Which purports to be a statement of fact, and yet you provided no links. I simply demonstrated the absurdity of your biased and u substantiated statement. Thank you for loving the Left.

No I’m not lying. I was expressing an opinion. Here’s the clue:

Be specific. I made a statement referring to Hamas and another referring to Trump. Which do you want a link to and why?

I’m beginning to think Trump feels he doesn’t have enough drama in his life. Why else would he set about a case like this that can only expose him to more scrutiny and give more publicity too the credible accusations against him?!

He needs to pay close attention to campaign finance law.

Blinkers off. Where’s the hypocrisy?

Let me correct you with my lefty point of view. Hamas are a callous and sadistic murdering terrorist scum. Trump is a treasonous, seditionist, toxic narcissist scum.

Cheney would also be a route back to what the Republican Party used to be before the raving lunatics took over.

Well there was a decision by medical staff at the Walter Reed Memorial Hospital that they should administer then President Trump the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test. Clearly it was their professional medical opinion that there was a clinical need for Trump to be administered this test. Do you agree those reasons should be released to enable voters to informed of why medical professionals thought the test on a serving President should be administered in the middle of the night?

Shouts into an empty hall.

Germany to Jeremy in one post, oh lefties and diversity all in one short post. Corbyn’s views are not related to the attack in Germany. But you know that.

Hardly a surprise, threats of gun violence and an attempt to violently overthrow an election have already occurred. Representatives sporting gun logos in Congress and other Representatives parading guns as part of their political messaging. Turn up the heat, it’ll eventually boil over. https://www.thepost.co.nz/a/world-news/350020043/weve-got-guns-and-well-use-them-say-trump-supporters https://time.com/6253690/ar-15-pins-congress/#:~:text=Some Republican members of,Americans' right to bear arms. https://www.nbcnews.com/think/amp/ncna1285709

And yet he’s out performing Trump on fund raising and almost entirely from individual American citizens not big business pacs.

There is no dispute that the judge’s identity and who appointed him, those are facts. True to what word? Which side of his bread buttered? Which hand is feeding him? What’s he being fed with? Where’s your facts Jonny? All baseless conspiracy. You don’t like Trump, being held to account, so you dream up a conspiracy.

It’s not going well for Trump, first the judge tells him to <deleted> up when Trump was audibly whinging as witnesses gave testimony and then his defense of ‘the valuations I used were provided by an expert (Doug Larson)’ goes up in smoke when Larson himself states on the stand and under oath he did not provide the basis for any of Trump’s fraudulent valuations. Do Trump’s written testimony to the court that Larson provided the basis for Trump’s valuations was a lie - a lie in deposition to the court. Once again ladies and gentlemen a reminder, $250,000,000 is the staring price. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/judge-warns-trump-to-keep-quiet-as-witness-testifies-against-him-in-civil-fraud-trial https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-employee-and-appraiser-testify-against-him-in-civil-fraud-trial

Off on another conspiracy Jonny?!