Chomper Higgot

Is this an admission that you’ve got nothing? It certainly adds nothing to the discussion other than you don’t like the President and you’ve got some sort of conspiracy problems with the media. Nobody owes you evidence to back up your claims, you start with the evidence then you base your claims on that evidence.

1. If the law requires a Doctor to report abortions performed on minors, why would a Doctor in Ohio, who did not perform an abortion, report an abortion performed by another doctor in Indiana? 2. You are correct, we should consider the source of stories. 2.1 The source of the allegations is/are un named ‘Conservative Critics’. 2.2 You yourself do not provide links to back up claims you make.

Or so a Conservative Critic has claimed without producing any evidence to back up the claim.

A story that isn’t true illustrates a greater truth?! That takes a rather peculiar logic, perhaps an Old Peculiar logic.

You seem to have forgotten the last incumbent had a Cognitive Test in the middle of the night, rushed to hospital for the very purpose.

US Jobs news just keeps getting better: https://www.ft.com/content/fb584dce-a910-4579-adc2-6421896dc905

A windfall tax on energy companies was a Labour Policy, re-hashed and re-named in a Tory U-Turn. Next.

There is no ‘Police Cover-Up’. Refer forum rules on spreading misinformation.

As disgraceful and unacceptable as Johnson’s constant lying is, I believe there is something far more serious deserving of a full and public investigation. Johnson has admitted to having a private meeting with an ex-KGB spy on the immediate aftermath of Putin’s use of biological weapons to murders political opponent in the UK. https://news.sky.com/story/amp/boris-johnson-a-risk-to-the-country-over-private-meeting-with-ex-kgb-agent-alexander-lebedev-12648085 We could of course simply ask Johnson to explain, but he would almost certainly lie.

Labour doing what? Labour are not in power.

Yes you did. But at the time it took place it was not in breach of any law or regulations. As the police have unequivocally stated: ’No case to answer’.

Sadly it’s not a joke.

Cameras produce images taken at a moment in time. At the moment in time when the images of Starmer drinking beer with his takeaway food was taken, he was not breaking any law or regulations in place at that time. As the police unequivocally stated ‘No case to answer’. Try to grasp that reality.

Candidates for the post are now promising tax cuts, without explaining how these tax cuts will be funded.

I see the truth hurts.

Where’s your evidence?

Why does it bother you so much? I get through the day without fretting over how others live their own life. It’s easy, effortless even.

But not against the law or regulations in place at the time. As the police clearly and unequivocally stated ‘No case to answer’.

I’d agree, that is veering off topic, set up by you with your ‘our cousins across the ocean’.

I think it had a lot more to do with his lies and a string of bi-election defeats. The Tory press turned on Johnson because he’s an asset to the opposition parties and a threat to Tory chances at the next election.

I’ll write what I want to say, it avoids you adding in stuff that I didn’t say.

I didn’t even mention the previous PM in my post you have ‘replied’ to.

All of which fits the Government of the past twelve years, and all candidates have been members of that Government. That said, I think ‘internecine knife fight’ better describes the Tory leader selection process. And before the resident pedants take umbrage, no, nobody is actually wielding a ‘knife’, though backs are being stabbed.

She frequently embarrasses herself by revealing a total lack of knowledge on any subject she happens to be pontificating on

Did you check the ingredients to see if there’s actually any prawn in them?