Chomper Higgot

The stuff you can’t demonstrate to be incorrect.

You’ve changed your tune on Stern. I wonder what brought that on?!

And demonstrated by their call to dismiss that Defendant Trump really did want to keep his affair with Daniels under wraps.

Well apart from the phone logs. And as you know, testimony is not always corroborated, Juries get to decide if it is credible, especially if other testimony recounts pattern behaviour. Regardless, your slurring the witness is noted.

There’s the reason for his anguish and personal attacks.

Yet more ad hominem. I look forward to you identifying what in my post you objected to is not aligned with US law or US court practice.

What we have evidence of is you attempting to slur the sworn testimony of Daniels with the ‘women can’t be trusted’ trope.

Thank you for bringing up Howard Stern, with the obvious intent that we should pay attention to what he had to say. I hope you too are listening.

So Stormy Daniels is E Jean Carrol air is it women can’t be believed?

Perhaps you should take that up with the Republicans, who scuppered the Bi-Partisan Bordet Security Bill to please Trump.

Go back to the post you are objecting to and identify anything that is outside U.S. Law or U.S. court procedure.

I’m sure you do. I love it when Trump fans run out of arguments and resort to making baseless assumptions about those whose opinion they can’t deal with.

He’s trying to put a positive spin on the news Braverman has hung him out to dry.

There needs to be a medal to recognize this level of stupid amongst serving members of the military.

So Daniels gives sworn testimony on the sexual encounter that Defendant Trump denied took place and that the Prosecution allege was the facts that the Defendant conspired to hide from voters. The Defense are given the opportunity to cross examine and of course Defendant Trump can himself take the stand. What the Defense choose to do is put on a performance for their client.

Is that the same Howard Stern who said: “The oddity in all of this is the people Trump despises most, love him the most,” said Stern on Tuesday. “The people who are voting for Trump, for the most part … He wouldn’t even let them in a f*****g hotel. He’d be disgusted by them.” And: “I don’t hate Donald,” Stern said. “I hate you for voting for him, for not having intelligence.” https://deadline.com/2020/05/howard-stern-donald-trump-despises-maga-supporters-1202933838/

Nah, you were just going all Godwin, while trying to ridicule the people with enough of that education you despise to see through you.

Says guy doing a lot of comparing to Nazis.

They might have been arrested and they might have been jailed, but the 1st Amendment is very clear that their arrest and incarceration was not ‘rightly so’. What's funny is you constructing an argument in one sentence and then immediately punch holes in it with your very next sentence. You seem at least to accept that the Palestinians have zero control over Hamas, and perhaps you’ll accept that no Palestinian that was either too young to vote in 2006 or not even born at the time is at all responsible, let alone accountable for Hamas.

Trump who already tried to overthrow the result of an election, promises to be a dictator on Day 1 is not ‘tongue in cheeks’ anything. It’s a warning from the would be dictator’s own mouth.

?

I think it prudent to take statement that Trump will be a Dictator on Day 1 as a warning. Because if he’s still a dictator on Day 2 it’s already too late to do anything about it.

The cross thread posting rule is a very good one. It avoids the kind of behavior you are exhibiting here. Posting a statement out of context of the discussion and the corrections I myself made with links to back them up.

Have you tried posting links to support statements you make, as you make them?

He’s also been pushing ‘replacement conspiracy’ and saying some naughty things about Jews who choose to use their right to vote as they please.