Chomper Higgot

We should perhaps have a thread on that. This isn’t it. Your knee jerk diversionary swerve to all things foreigner is noted.

Not happy the Labour Government are deporting illegal immigrants then and obviously not prevented from doing so by the ECHR I wonder what was really behind the Tory failure on immigration? A cynic might think they needed an immigration problem to keep the rabid right on board. A problem if their own making.

You do understand the principle that new laws may not breach existing laws and treaties? OK, perhaps you don’t, however the UK Supreme Court does. The Tories spent £175,000,000 for each of the 4 immigrants who volunteered to leave. You donor do not support the Labour Government deporting 9000 convicted foreign criminals and do you have an excuse for the Tories not having done so? Well I’m clearly calling out your nonsense, hence your resort to ad hominem.

£700 million splurged on an illegal scheme that managed to deport 4 volunteers. I look forward to the next update on this data: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-removes-highest-number-of-illegal-migrants-in-5-years

Did you not learn anything from the BBC being found guilty of libel against proud Irish patriot Gerry Adams? Libel is a serious matter, libelous allegations of terrorism doubly so.

The EHCR stopped the first flight and handed the case back to the British courts, the British Supreme Court ruled the Rwanda scheme illegal. The EHCR prevent the British Government from breaking the law. I thought the Tories said they had taken back control of British borders? Sadly, that’s not sarcasm.

Cutting subsidies (AKA handouts of tax payer’s money) is all of a sudden communism. British farmers have been on the ‘farming welfare’ tit for too long, they’ve become addicted to handouts.

It was British courts that blocked the Rwanda flights, not the ECHR. Doh!

Definitely an attack on British steel, and therefore British jobs and the British economy. And here you are, a self proclaimed patriot Bit, cheering it on.

The Beeb had its day in court and Adams has his place in the history of rightly proud Irish patriots. ‘The Troubles’ are over.

Because 30% of the population lay in bed suffering hot flushes in the middle of the night thinking about it.

Farage pulled that trick again this week. After plenty of news of Labour’s internal discussion on the matter, Farage announces he would remove the limit (laced of course with some immigration nonsense). His un-costed spending ideas are already north of £85Billion, easy promises he doesn’t have to deliver on.

So why the need to massively increase the debt ceiling?

Don’t panic, incoming TACO, low and to the right.

Not hearing much from ‘Latinos for Trump’ these days.

The fixation with other people’s sexuality is entirely one of the rightwing. We see it constantly on this forum, rightwing members obsessed with gender, they can’t stay away from the topic. The question is why?

Oddly enough, the idea that ordinary working people should get something for the taxes they pay is catching on. Stripping money out of food programs to help the poor, gutting Veteran services and hollowing out Medicaid to fund tax cuts for the hyper wealthy is precisely that OPM you talk of.

And yet Bernie and AOC are packing out venues with voters from across both parties eager to hear their progressive message, while Republicans can’t hold a town hall without getting booed and heckled by the ‘Republicans’ they invite to attend.

Except that was never a ‘Dem’ thing. It is however messaging that got millions of Americans to vote for the agenda that is now harming them.

Engaging with Congress would also negate the ever present opportunity for TACO. Which is the absurdity underlying the whole unforced error Trump is engaging in.

The grandstanding idiot is not charged with denigrating an object of veneration. He’s charged as follows: As for burning the U.S. flag, it’s not a crime in the U.S. (protected free speech) provided the flag is your own. That said, only an idiot would expect to not face consequences if they were to travel around various U.S. cities burning Old Glory. Likewise burning religious texts, do it enough times in enough places and pretend to be shocked by the outcome. …. Now who is it that bangs on about flag burning?

What ‘bogus charges’?

That’s a function of how appeals work. Look at that as something new you’ve learned while at the same time having your nonsense claims debunked.

This is the real problem. The CEO sleeping at night with his phone on silent has zero impact on the root causes of this obvious design flaw.

So that’s a no then, the appeals court has not substantiated your ill informed nonsense.