-
Posts
37,426 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
39
Content Type
Events
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Gallery
Blogs
Everything posted by Chomper Higgot
-
The idiocy is clear. Rwanda is, we are told, both and simultaneously, a horrible place that the mere chance of being sent there will deter ‘the boats’ and a lovely safe place to send asylum seekers. It takes a special kind of stupid to hold those two things on your head and not conclude someone is telling lies.
-
‘Playing into the hand of right wing groups’ and then you launch into an anti ‘left wing woke mob’. You might want to consider the posit hat the whole doomed Tory policy is not at all intended to address immigration but designed to distract the public from the ever growing litany of Tory failures. The ‘Rwanda’ scheme is an agreement to ‘exchange’ asylum seekers, with Rwanda sending asylum seekers to the UK. It’s already cost well over a hundred million of tax payers pounds and will continue to cost more millions with zero impact on immigration. It does get right wingers wound up into an ‘anti left woke mob’ rant while blinding to the Government’s failures. You’re being played and you are willingly playing your part.
-
Drugs and guns seized from extreme-right Austrian biker gangs
Chomper Higgot replied to Social Media's topic in World News
-
The reason the UK are ‘putting up’ these ‘illegal immigrants’ is because the UK Government has failed to manage asylum assessment and clearance. Result, people claiming asylum are not being processed at anywhere near an acceptable rate, the Government fix for this was remove the definition of required processing time. Outcome genuine asylum seekers are not being cleared and allowed to earn their own living in the UK, while bogus asylum seekers are not being identified and removed. Nobody objects to bogus asylum seekers being removed. The question to be asked is why have the Government spent time and money on their Rwanda scheme, which they were warned would break UK and international law instead of fixing the asylum claim assessment and removal of bogus claimants?
-
Correct. This from the BBC: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-66051292.amp Perhaps Sunak would be better advised to reinstate a functioning Asylum assessment scheme, the current one having been deliberately stripped of the budget and resources it needs to operate. Genuine asylum seekers might ten be removed from expensive detention and put to work in the economy which needs workers while those failing assessment can be removed from expensive detention and legally deported. Cost savings in the provision of detention, workers provided for the economy, illegal migrants legally removed and the UK’s obligations to international treaties complied with. Not a win win, but a win win win win.
-
I’m looking forward to the formal report. I’m quite certain it’s going to reference Rush’s well publicized disregard for safety and regulations. Perhaps if investigation finds no evidence of a reckless disregard for safety and regulations Rush can file suit .. oh but wait.. he can’t. https://www.insider.com/titan-submarine-ceo-complained-about-obscenely-safe-regulations-2023-6?amp
-
Refer news article referencing court case and safety concerns raised by guy fired for raising safety concerns. I do know a bit about the engineering and design of safety critical systems and pressure systems. Its a required area of knowledge for Professional Engineers such as myself in the particular field I work in. Evidence, refer news article posted and wreckage recovered .
-
You are aware that pressure testing of vessels is a process in which the vessel is subjected to a pressure that exceeds the service pressure? You are aware why it is that the engineering of pressure vessels requires design pressure to exceed service pressure. How could the victims possibly know what the risks were if they were not aware of the failure of the company to apply design codes, regulations and testing, where they aware the vessel was constructed of out of date materials, were they aware the viewing window was not rated for the service? Signing a waiver does not demonstrate any knowledge of the actual risk, nor does it indemnify the operator against the consequences of negligence and disregard for safety. https://www.penneylawyers.com/serious-injuries/do-liability-waivers-hold-up-in-court/
-
House Republicans embark on a mission: Avenge Trump
Chomper Higgot replied to Social Media's topic in World News
Not like they have anything else that needs dealing with on behalf of the American nation. -
Not so. They were informed three times that death was possible (it always is), they had no information on the probability of death, and the probability of death is the risk. We’re any aware of the fact the sub had been constructed with out of date materials, without the application of the correct manufacturing methods, in appropriate methods of gluing an inspection window into place that was itself not rated for the service. The employee who informed Rush of these shortfalls was fired for doing so, a matter of court record.
-
corporate manslaughter is a thing and people do go to jail for gross negligence. I’ve already given links correcting your misunderstandings around signing waivers in the other thread discussing this. I see you missed out my comments on NDT Testing. False equivalence alarm: Jeepny v sub operating kms below surface of a freezing ocean.
-
Illegal trade in AI child sex abuse images exposed
Chomper Higgot replied to Social Media's topic in World News
I would think the answer is obvious. The normalization of child sexual abuse. Learn the behavior on an avatar and feed the need for more, until reality breaks out.