Chomper Higgot

Which doesn’t address the Prosecutors seeking and obtaining the court protective order for : "information pertaining to ongoing investigations, the disclosure of which could compromise those investigations and identify uncharged individuals." [underline added by me]. In a parallel move the DOJ has slapped down the request by Republicans in Congress to lift the lid on the DOJ investigation. https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4056871-judge-orders-trump-not-to-disclose-evidence-in-documents-case/amp/

Just 7 Tories voted to reject the report’s findings. There we have it, 7 Tory MPs willing to vote in favour of Johnson. Let’s have no more nonsense about Johnson making a comeback anytime soon,

The Tories are playing their last overs and even then they can’t play with a straight bat. An utterly shameful bunch of cowards.

Perhaps trying to avoid being ‘run out’.

No, the inquiry was released tgen it was sent to parliament for parliament to approve. That’s how parliamentary inquiries are processed.

You don’t like there being a parliamentary record censuring your boy Johnson for his serial lying to parliament. I get that, I do.

Serially lying to parliament is not ‘inconsequential’ nor was the vote. We now have on record the names of almost 300 Tories who are not willing to vote to pass judgment on the serial liar Johnson.

I’m not refuting the data, I’m refuting your comment: ” 100% not true. Why do you think they needed to increase the debt ceiling ?” You’ve asked a question, I have responded with an example of why the debt ceiling needed to be increased and another which was totally unnecessary.

Look up the prosecutor on Tate’s case, balls of tungsten carbide.

What he could never brag about is declassifying that particular document, it was always outwith his power to do so.

The problem with 100% true is it can’t be applied when referring to complex causes. There was indeed ‘a need’ to borrow to spend during the pandemic. There was absolutely not ‘a need’ to hand $1.3 Trillion in tax breaks to the hyper wealthy and high profit corporations.

More good news in a year already brimming with good news for Justice.

Starmer is engaging in the wise policy if not interrupting your enemy while they are making mistakes. He need only remind the electorate that while the Tories squabble the key issues faced by the nation are getting worse and getting zero attention from the Tories.

The lack of news on the progress of investigations under Jack Smith has a habit of being a very poor indicator of what Jack Smith is investigating.

This ‘Witch hunt’ that relies on the sworn testimony of Trump loyalists, his attorneys, members of his administration, Republicans and members of his own family.

We know as a matter of recorded fact Trump hid evidence and documents from his attorneys, why then pin hopes on Trump’s attorneys saying they can’t find documents?

The Durham police inquiry found no COVID lockdown rules were broken by Starmer. Let me know when you have facts rather than wild conspiracy .

Obviously you don’t understand the basic principle that a law cannot be broken if the law isn’t in place at the time. The lockdown rules were changed more than once, thee rules in place at the time of Johnson’s partying were not the same as those at the time of Starmer’s work related event.

These numbers will change as the main news channels move to covering Trump’s crimes and trials. The GOP need to find another candidate.

“Document No. 19 Formerly Restricted Data concerning nuclear weaponry of the United States.” Now, why did he want to hold in to this and who had access to it?

He’s just been on FOX running his mouth again and destroying reasonable doubt arguments by the minute. Trump’s mouth is an evidence rich environment. Give him a ‘gag order’? Nah, give him a stage a microphone and cameras to capture the flow of self incriminating statements as they flow.

Now you are giving me lectures on logic. Members who actually know me will find that as amusing as I do.

My dog ate my video tapes.

That was yesterday’s ticket price.

The problem with your attempt of whataboutary is you fail to tell us what these ‘a lot worse things going on’ were. People being denied visits to dying loved ones or to attend funerals of family members while parties were being held at Conservative Party HQ would be my punt.