Chomper Higgot

There’s no such thing as ‘Transing kids’.

Like I said, it’s never happened. But don’t sweat it too much, you can always live in hope.

Tell us about the last time somebody pushed their sexuality on you.

If you are going to claim things as fact then you can hardly object to the science on the matter. You don’t have an argument against the science so you pull your go to ‘left’ rabbit out of the place you keep it.

It’s day 7 of Pride month already and I’ve not seen anyone pushing their sexuality on anybody. Nobody is pushing their sexuality on you. Although I don’t discount your anxiety over the possibility, I’m sure it keeps you up night thinking about it.

There are indeed men and women. But medical science tells us there’s more variation to each than you might want to accept.

No I mean Western Europe, as in aligned, not as in previously occupied/controlled by the USSR.

It’s a scenario based on the premise that Trump would order the US multi art to defend US allies/uphold defense treaty obligations and do anything at all to upset Putin. I say relax. Unless of course you are in Taiwan or Western Europe.

You don’t have to look.

That’s a very odd question given your earlier post:

Yes, if there’s people who want to do that. I don’t see a problem with it.

You did read the article?: The root problem is the national grid, not the sources of power feeding the grid.

Please do continue to argue with the views you yourself imagined.

That’s known as a non-corollary argument. No I don’t believe transgender people are mentally ill. I do have concerns over the mental health of people who are fixated on transgender people, but that’s not the subject of discussion.

But it’s not one day. Try to come to terms with that.

No. When did I say they could?

This ‘white British’ thing and concern over both parents needing to be ‘white British’ has the ring of that ‘blood purity’ fixation of which history provides examples.

I’ve not attacked the messenger. I have criticized his message and provided a reasoned basis for my criticism. My argument doesn’t, for example, rely on statements like ‘your ilk’, I leave such nonsense to you.

That’s a remarkable statement. Let’s see your evidence to back it up. Credible science? Credible medical opinions? Or just ill informed reactionary nonsense?

Now that is what I do call a deflection. The subject article draws conclusions and makes predictions on the basis of obviously bogus graphs and a very dubiously constructed definition of ‘white British’ Matt Goodwin has spent enough time in academia to absolute understand the fact of his arguments, it’s the kind stuff I would expect he would return to a student with a failed grading. The article is an excellent demonstration of an academic ignoring the very basics of academic rigour. More please.

“Puberty blockers are banned in the UK to treat gender dysphoria in under-18s.” https://healthmedia.blog.gov.uk/2024/12/11/puberty-blockers-what-you-need-to-know/

Feeling left out Jonny?

Nobody supports ‘transing the kids’. Its not a thing

As late as 75. I’m more than a bit surprised.

The graph attached to this report tells you the first thing you need to know about the reports basis. Straight lines on graphs arise from one of two reasons. 1. They are drawn between just two points. 2. They have multiple data points that all align perfectly to the straight line. The second is highly unlikely for any ‘real world data’. Two straight intersecting lines on one graph suggests they were both drawn between imaginary points or the universe has thrown up an unbelievable coexistence of two straight lines with perfectly aligned ‘real world data’ The graphs are obviously nonsense. As for the Goodwin’s definition of ‘White British’ being someone who has two ‘white British’ parents. Lets examine a case. Nigel is white British born in Britain of two white British parents. Nigel marries a white German woman, who comes to live with him in England where they have children born in Britain. Does Nigel have to worry that his children are not white British? This from a man who is himself defining families like those of Nigel as not ‘white British’. Next up, not white and thereafter not British. British members of the forum with mixed race children take heed.