You have reputedly made a connection between those who support tackling climate change and ‘Globalists’.
Can you please explain the basis of the connection you make?
There’s two parts to this thread.
Global warming and human suffering.
Oddly, those who argue against tackling the global warming, or that it can even be tackled, also argue against addressing the human suffering.
Not all humans pollute to the same degree.
Therefore, following your Malthusian arguments, perhaps we need hit the big nail and get rid of the big polluters first.
Or perhaps its some others there are too many of?
I’m all for Trump getting back on Twitter.
His handlers are less keen.
Which is why he rarely appears in live broadcasts these days.
And that’s apart from the legal jeopardy he puts himself in when he opens his mouth.
He can, but he’s be far better advised to open a UK account, get his pension paid there and never mention he’s living in Thailand.
As soon as the pension service know he’s living in Thailand they will withhold annual cost of living increases.
There’s good news too.
Voter turnout is breaking records across the US.
Citizens motivated to take part in elections can only be a good thing for democracy:
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/midterm-elections-early-voting-updates-turnout-surpasses-prior/story?id=92022629
The Mirror reported magistrates’ court findings.
I already stated I understand why you don’t want to accept that, now you wander off topic into other parts of the world.
What are we to make of that?