Chomper Higgot

I’ve said for a while now Musk is destroying ’Brand Musk’ and with it tge over inflated share prices hitched to ‘Brand Musk’.

Somebody bought those same shares. When somebody buys a load of shares the price goes up, that’s how shares work.

You left the UK to avoid paying taxesand you somehow missed paying NI contributions, but you want benefits. If you were earning a good salary (£5K a month taxes?) then why do you need benefits? Most benefits have a residence requirement. Pensions have a contribution requirement. Taxes are paid for each year and have bearing on benefits of entitlements beyond that year.

How are the actual trade numbers doing?

You’ve obviously been very busy visiting all the supermarkets. So much easier to check what the UK’s Rowntree Foundation have to say: https://www.westyorks-ca.gov.uk/all-news-and-blogs/the-joseph-rowntree-foundation-uk-poverty-2022-report/

People who can’t afford to eat regular meals or heat their homes are being joined now by people who can’t afford to pay their mortgages. So which essentials are you referring to?

Which does not address the issue of poverty and hunger in the UK. Rather you deflect with anything other than discussion of the underlying issue of poverty and hunger.

Here’s the best bit: The fake electors signed their names on the fraudulent documents. And here’s the even better bit: They then formally submitted the fraudulent documents they had signed. And the very best bit: The fraudulent documents are retained by the national archives and available to prosecutors.

Also included in the funding bill are provisions to prevent a repeat of the attempted J6 Coup. Closing loop holes and ambiguities exploited by Trump and his insurrectionist.

Unfortunately for Trump, and your argument, tax evasion is simple to understand and explain. The DOJ have people who understand this stuff.

There’s a surprise… only five red flags.

Here’s a conundrum. How does a rightwinger who has argued against lockdowns and that they were an imposition upon basic human rights now respond to people fleeing lockdowns committing that other rightwing trigger issue, sneaking across the border.

Baseless innuendo. You’ve got nothing else.

What’s US growth compared to UK growth? (Inflation - Growth) is the number that matters.

Hannity and FOX now have a problem. If Hannity had believed the election was stolen then he would have grounds to claim the libelous misinformation he broadcast were views he honestly held and his statements were made in good faith. The sworn testimony that he admits he did not believe what he was broadcasting is evidence of deliberately lying in his broadcasts. Libelous statements made in good faith are still libelous, but libelous statements made in the full knowledge of their falsehood raise the level of liability with their deliberate intent.

Yet Russia has used nerve agent weapons in a murderous attack within at least one NATO nation.

Approval rating and being a stooge, is a non sequitur. Regardless, I see you are brand new member to the forum. I might have missed that since brand new members don’t normally dive straight into the contentious issues. Anyhow welcome, it’s always nice to have the possibility of new voices.

More appeasement. There’s only one group of people who have the right to determine how to deal with Putin’s illegal war of invasion, they are Ukrainians. They like being Ukrainians, they don’t want to be Russians. Putin will eventually be replaced, whoever comes in might be worse, which is only more reason to ensure Putin’s illegal war of aggression is not rewarded with territorial gains handed to him in any negotiations. But I’m rather puzzled by your objections to my comment regarding the Russians taking care of Putin, since it’s an argument you yourself have made - Perhaps you received an update on the party line talk track? When did I ever suggest NATO joining in this war?

And there is the argument for arming and assisting Ukraine. Fight Russia in Ukraine. And let the Russians take care of Putin.

“You cannot seriously think Putin will just put his tail between his legs and slink off.” Defeat will have political consequences for Putin. But to flip your question. Do you seriously think Putin will cease his illegal invasions if he’s not stopped this time?

And yet you are arguing against spending money to help Ukraine defeat Russia. Clearly it is very much cheaper to have Ukraine defeat Russia and creates far less risk of escalation. Containing Russia back within its pre invasion borders is the Ukrainian objective and it is one that accords with international law and the maintenance of international peace.

As much support as it takes and as much blood as the Ukrainians are willing to shed to defend their home country, or conversely Russians are willing to spill prosecuting their illegal war. If the Ukrainians need help, give them the help they need.

I seem to remember you defending borrowing money to provide tax cuts to the already wealthy. I certainly don’t recall you ever defending or calling for programs to help the poor. But thanks for bringing your new found concern for the vulnerable at home to my attention. I’ll keep it in mind during future discussions.

Yes. Much better than appeasing a tyrant and condemning the young to go fight in the inevitable wars that ensue.

Take that up with Putin, it is he who ordered the illegal invasion of Ukraine.