Chomper Higgot

What does the data on EV sales tell you?

Snide allegation

But those that do are voting Liberal and not turning Conservative as they age.

Perhaps it was over priced or perhaps it’s now facing growing competition from other EV manufacturers. Meanwhile the sale of EVs is booming.

Here’s another, investing in public transport, safer cleaner and creating well paid jobs in America: https://ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/news/2022/04/06/public-transit-investment-infrastructure-biden

There’s an example in the OP. Did you miss it?

You bang on a lot about other people having kids. Not so much about which kids grow up to create the most per capita pollution.

No, it’s my argument against statement: “Governments shouldn't be in the business of subsidising anything, full stop.” Clearly there are times when Government subsidies have very positive outcomes.

Almost the entirety of the internet/AI revolution is founded on technologies seeded by Government funding.

Trump’s mouth is an evidence rich environment.

In the meantime EV sales continue to surge.

Contempt for customers never did any industry well, let alone a political party.

Nothing for Republicans to worry about then.

Which ones, those in support of new technology or those in support of fossil fuels? Surging EV sales are definitely market forces.

Vehicle manufacturers enjoying booming sales of vehicles made in America that meet their customers’ needs. What leftwing nonsense is this?!

Now you claim it’s because ‘I’m ashamed to admit it’. Admit what? Or is that you accepting you have zero evidence to back your accusations? Do the right thing Johnny, accept you made a baseless accusation.

I do some things I regard as positive, I’ve mentioned them on this forum before, but got accused of ‘virtue signaling’. So I don’t mention those things so much these days.

The proposal is, I believe, to be voted on by Australian citizens, I think it’s clear they will decide. The proposal itself is not the subject of the thread. How did US policies get in to this? Perhaps you can now provide a link to your assertion of me supporting racist policies. You made that assertion, now either back it up or retract your assertion.

Sorry, I was simply welcoming your environmental and human rights input, now and future. Well done with your tree planting/donations.

Please provide a link to any post I have made in support of your assertion: ”You are supporting a racist policy.” Simple as that Johnny, provide a link to me posting any statement in support of any racist policy. Or are you making baseless assertions?

Welcome on board the environment and human rights bus. I look forward to reading your future support for environmental and human rights issues.

Unqualified respect, beyond words.

I’m not sure you understand what racism is, your posts above indicate you were unable to recognize the racism in the memes reported at the top of the OP. They didn’t didn’t make your observation of ‘the only racism here’. Where I have identified your blindness to overt racism by direct reference to your own posts, you’ll struggle to find any post by me supporting racism of any kind. Give it a go, see if you can find a post by me supporting racism, feel free to quote my exact words in context. In the event you can’t find a post by me supporting racism then do the right thing and refrain from stating that I do.

Double down on your blindness to overt racism, why don’t you. Your issues on race and gender identity are noted.

Sorry Johnny, I don’t have ‘a race card’, refer topic of discussion for the ‘racism’. Oddly, you claim “The only racism here is the proposal that a specific race has a specific body consisting of people from that specific race to advise the government on issues concerning that specific race.” And yet in the opening paragraph of the OP there is the following: ”Racist memes depicting First Nations Australians as "grifters", "wife beaters" and "primitives" flash across his phone.” Clearly you don’t consider that as racism. Such overt racism which is clearly the topic of discussion and you omit it from your claim of ‘the only racism here’. What should we make of that?