Jump to content

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    36,208
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    39

Everything posted by Chomper Higgot

  1. Don’t waste your time with these guys. Immigrants are out performing them in the job market, the children of immigrants are out performing their kids in school and university, immigrants are, through education and hard work rising to the top of companies, rising to the top of the professions and doing great in private business. Some folk respond with fear and hatred. There’s a reason for that.
  2. Again, I’m not sure flying a helicopter is evidence of intellect. Hand eye coordination, spatial awareness maybe, I suspect having the right family name helps with being given the opportunity. Sorry, I’m not buying helicopter flying as an indication of intelligence. You need to look-up the meaning of ‘psychoanalysis’.
  3. Asia is a possibility he could choose. The United States is not.
  4. I wouldn’t describe someone who had to go begging £15,000 of a guy running a brothel in order to pay off his ex-wife’s debts as ‘someone with money’. https://www.newsweek.com/sarah-fergusons-money-troubles-prince-andrews-jeffrey-epstein-1473562
  5. No I have not. But I’m not sure how that relates to him being bright, unless of course you are suggesting his family name had no bearing.
  6. It’s owned by Hienz and made in The Netherlands. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HP_Sauce
  7. What you do/have done is a matter for British law. Have sex with a trafficked 17 year old American and it becomes a matter for US law, I have already provided you one of the applicable statutes.
  8. I don’t think Prince Andrew has ever been credibly accused of being bright.
  9. There are many reasons why people are not charged under Federal Law, especially rich, powerful, well connected people. This has no bearing on ‘credible accusation’.
  10. He’s credibly accused of sex crimes. Why the rush to defend him I wonder?!
  11. My statement is ‘Prince Andrew was credibly accused of sex crimes’. I never once stated he was charged.
  12. Did you notice the evidence I gave for my statement that Prince Andrew was credibly accused of sex crimes was a court filing submitted to a court in Florida (USA). The alleged victim is an American. Trafficking a US Citizen who is a minor for sex is a Federal Crime. When trafficked out of the US then US Federal Law still applies.
  13. Clearly I don’t. I normally label it nonsense and provide an explanation why. But, thanks for confirming you can’t back up you assertion
  14. I have never claimed to be British. In fact I have never once posted any confirmation of my nationality on this forum. Quit being personal, stop making stuff up.
  15. Enjoy: 18 U.S. Code § 1591 - Sex trafficking of children or by force, fraud, or coercion https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1591
  16. No I am not. I have stated he was credibly accused of sex crimes, I provided a link to the US court filing - matters of fact. I have not engaged in attacks on Prince Andrew other than to state facts recorded in court records.
  17. The woman in question was under 18 at the time. Refer Federal Law I linked above, it is very clear on the matter.
  18. I never made such an allegation. Please provide a link where I did.
  19. You’ve made the allegation, now back it up. Give me an example of me engaging in mass psychosis.
  20. By providing links to the relevant law and not engaging in personal attacks.
  21. I didn’t read a link to make my post. I’ve provided a link to Federal Law per your request, deal with it.
  22. Making a joke out of of sexual exploitation of a young woman because you don’t have an argument Anglo at the legal facts.
  23. She was under the age of 18, and therefore not legally competent to give conscientious to engage in paid. Regardless of which paid sex with someone under the age of 18 is a federal crime. Refer link in previous post above.
  24. You can start with 18 U.S. Code § 1591 - Sex trafficking of children or by force, fraud, or coercion
×
×
  • Create New...