Chomper Higgot

‘Convicted of no crime’ is a pretty low bar to set. What crime did the protester commit?

One black person?

So were the tons of drugs being brought into the US by immigrants looking for asylum/work or were they transported by drug mules? Me thinks you are conflating drug smuggling with immigrants. Just as you are implying immigrants are a crime threat because 60 out of 1,600,000 are murderers and 500 out of 1,600,000 are rapists. Oh I get it. Gross negative generalizations of a whole mass of people based on the actions of a tiny minority. Right up your street.

I suspect they might help the immigrants out by paying them to do jobs. Jobs need doing, immigrants are looking for work. Win win. Just like it always was.

I have no idea. I’m not even sure why are you asking me. You seem to be in on the ‘know’ given your certainty as to why Prince Andrew was stripped of his military and Royal titles. Perhaps you found out the by asking random people online.

Why does anyone need to provide a home to someone who’s come to America to work?

Sorry Even’ I don’t always give your posts the attention you perhaps believe they deserve. Now did the ‘apprehensions’ include ‘circular migrations’ and what constitutes an ‘apprehension’?.

“I am wondering if you yourself Larry have ever been the victim of misinformation? ” He says, immediately after linking to to FOX ‘News’.

Park it elsewhere. You are well out of order. Queen Elizabeth II’s funeral is not an occasion for you to promote division and hatred.

I don’t spend my time trying to turn. Queen Elizabeth II’s funeral into an opportunity to display bigotry.

Link please.

Perhaps you should leave bike your bigotry out of the funeral of Queen Elizabeth II. Look who was the very first to get in line in a London to pay their respects to their Queen: “Vanessa Nanthakumaran, Annie and Grace wait in line Tuesday to bid farewell to Queen Elizabeth II.” https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/crowds-london-queen-coffin-royal-procession-lies-in-state-westminster-rcna47515

Justice is being served, Trump’s pulling every stunt he can think of to try and slow it down but Justice is coming. Trump can have his KFC menus back, the classified and secret documents he stole will remain with the DOJ as evidence, after which they’ll be returned to the National Archives. Trump can answer for the whereabouts of the classified and secret documents he stole that are no longer in his possession. Trump is on indictment watch.

It won’t get that far, the DOJ have already said they will appeal the obviously lawned ruling.

Did he pay tax on the transfer?

Maybe someone at the newspaper is selecting what news they print for you to read.

If I knew why Prince Andrew’s mum stripped him of his military and Royal titles, I wouldn’t have asked the question in the first place.

Prince Andrew had his chance to clear his name, he decided he’d rather pay out millions in order to forgo that chance. He paid out millions and left the question of his guilt unanswered. He’s in a position suspicion that is of his own choosing, and aid for it even.

I wonder why his mum stripped him of all those military titles and Royal appointments?

So why did he pay out millions. I’m not the subject of this thread, neither is your imaginations on what my nationality might be. Stick to topic please.

It was a civil law suit, the outcome of which is always a two part decision. Is the allegation substantiated? If substantiated how much compensation must be paid? Prince Andrew first demanded a trial by jury and then decided, of his own volition, to pay up. So innocent he thought paying out millions was the best option.

Perhaps they do. Use of a phone is not a definition of what constitutes being trafficked.

Don’t want to address the fact my statement was correct then.

“Andrew was staring down the barrel of discovery, and the decision to settle will ultimately save him from that process. As part of discovery, both Giuffre and Andrew were set to give video depositions under oath” https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/prince-andrew-virginia-giuffre-settlement-jeffrey-epstein-1300515/

Sounds more like some rich guy with connections buying his way out of having to face ‘Discovery’ and provide a ‘Deposition under oath’. Which is what it was.