Chomper Higgot

“Explaining the rules of the sea and maritime law the immigration expert explained why French vessels were spotted seeming to escort migrants to UK waters.”

Let’s ponder the response from some parts of the press and public to a recent marriage into the British Royal Family.

Fact? Please provide evidence of this claimed ‘fact’?

Irrelevant, once in the UK they are subject to and protected by UK law.

But the court has also prevented a number of deportations. The cost to tax payers of this ill-conceived policy is climbing by the minute.

I’ve already answered your question, once again incase you missed it:

Not always so. Visas issued to Ukrainian refugees being an example.

Then deal with that in the UK immigration courts under UK law.

I have no idea. But if they are not ‘Asylum seekers’ then why is the Government trying to deport them under the under the Government’s ‘Rwanda Asylum Plan’?

I don’t have need if a bridge thank you. That’s a big ‘If’.

Irrelevant, once in the UK they are subject to and have the protections of UK law. Entering the UK to seek asylum is not illegal.

Entering the UK to seek asylum is not illegal. Do you agree with everyone, including the Government being held accountable to the law?

Nothing at all if it’s where you choose to go. But the UK Government must obey the law and may not unlawfully deport people to Rawanda, though as demonstrated in the High Court that was the Government’s intention.

It seems Charles was on to something. A number of individuals have successfully defeated the Government’s attempt to deport them to Rawanda and in doing so demonstrated beyond doubt that the Government was in their case acting unlawfully. So we have it demonstrated in the High Court that without the assistance of NGO’s the Government was prepared to, and in the process of, deporting people out with their legal rights. Charles was right, this is appalling.

Nothing strange about your off topic hyperbole .

Logical argument not your thing then.

Hot on the heals of Tory MP Lee Anderson’s assertion that the poor need to be taught how they can cook 30p nourishing meals.

Perhaps you could tell what you believe is being done to the USA right now that is damaging?

But where are the venomous protestations and coming from? The outrage, oh so much outrage.

Because like Charles, you were not elected, unlike Charles you posted your comments online, Charles made his comments in private.

This.

Odd thought for you to post online.

He got the hump because Pelosi understood the rules and out played him.

His private comments were leaked, they do not constitute meddling in anything.

Thank you, but actually it only needed to be one to prove the fallacy I was addressing. And there’s more to come.