Chomper Higgot

Meanwhile, what millions of people are actually having to deal with: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/nov/02/uk-food-prices-soar-by-fastest-rate-on-record-as-cost-of-living-crisis-bites

So you’ll accept the verdict but if you don’t get to see the footage you’ll have your doubts. In other words your acceptance of the Jury verdict is conditional. Why doesn’t that surprise me?!

The trial, that’s the bit where both the prosecution and defense present and challenge evidence and testimony. The Jury then decide a verdict. Let’s see who does and doesn’t accept the evidence and testimony presented at trial, let’s see who does or doesn’t accept the Jury’s verdict.

I don’t wish anything was the case. I shall however take note of your response to body camera footage, if revealed, and your response if not revealed. I myself shall wait for the trial and look forward to the Jury’s verdict, which I shall accept regardless of what the verdict is.

And if there is no footage?

I don’t think it’ll make a blind bit of difference. I suspect, based on your posts in this thread, you’ll simply switch to asking more inane question, such as where the shadows fall or the angle of view. Here’s what I’m going to do. Wait for the trial. If you have any relevant information you believe the defense, or indeed the prosecution might benefit from, do your civil duty and pass it on to the attorneys, I’m sure they’ll be delighted to hear from you.

I can think of a relatively recent example in which hundreds of hours worth of body camera, security and news camera footage has been released depicting a mass violent attack. And yet very many right wingers insist it depicts a peaceful protest. We can all also read through your posts in this thread. So please excuse me if I don’t buy your wanting to see body camera evidence before you make up your mind.

How very convenient.

Trump really doesn’t like being held accountable under the law. He needs to get used to it.

I’m not aware of this alternative science(TM) of yours. Maybe the ‘politically motivated’ thing came from the same place as your need to refer to others as ‘collectivists’.

Don’t worry Lindsey, still has his Fifth Amendment rights. Or he could just turn up, stand up, take the oath and tell the truth. What will it be?

Go on, tell us what your alternative to science is?

Let’s not address the myriad problems people in the UK are facing, let’s scapegoat migrants.

I suggest taking this up with the people who told you they were going to fix the problem.

He’s withdrawn most of Truss’ lunacy which has calmed the markets and he’s said a few crowd pleasing things. But he hasn’t actually done anything yet. There’s a Tory created £50,000,000,000 hole in the National finances and Sunak is weeks away from the budget that will address that hole. Will he tax windfall profits, unearned incomes, sign up for the CCCB or will he enact Tory Austerity 2. Putting an end to Truss’ lunacy was the easy bit, now he needs to deliver.

UK taxes due are calculated between April 6~April 5, what a tax payer lost in previous years is irrelevant. she’ll and BP’s international (non UK) businesses do not pay tax in the UK. Good to see you sticking up for vast windfall profits over ordinary people struggling to heat their homes.

And there you have it, primed for a conspiracy. I’ll wait for the trial.

And if you don’t see the tapes (which may or may not exist)? Or if you are told there are no tapes?

So, what you have been told the police said doesn’t match what you have been told Paul Pelosi said.

Both of which came to you second hand.

Pleased to see you survived the attack Even’. I trust you were not subject to online haters blaming you and your family for making yourselves victims of your attacker. Stay safe.

Sounds awful.

At least I understand the fossil fuel/watt consumed to create the electricity I consume is the aggregate fossil fuel usage of the generating methods used to produce the power I consume.

Nah, you haven’t grasped some realities. Coal fired power stations are the least efficient fossil-field generators, they comprise around 37% of the world’s generating capacity. Gas powered generators comprise around 24% of global generating capacity and are very much more efficient than at coal powered generators. Hydro provides 16% of global generating capacity at zero use of fossil fuels. Nuclear comprises 10% of global generating capacity at zero fossil fuels. Wind and solar together comprise 8% of global generating capacity and both at zero fossil fuels. There is 5% of global power generating capacity from other sources not stated When a consumer plugs their EV in to charge it, the are receiving electricity that was generated at the combined efficiency of all generators to the grid. Coal is the least efficient user of fossil fuels, other generators are either very much more efficient or don’t use fossil fuels. Hence your cherry picked coal fired power stations are nowhere near representative of the efficiency and fossil fuel usage that needs to be compared with that of Internal Combustion Engines. You’re arguments are flawed.

You are cherry picking. 2019 world electricity generation by source (total generation was 27 petawatt-hours)[1][2] Coal (37%) Natural gas (24%) Hydro (16%) Nuclear (10%) Wind (5%) Solar (3%) Other (5%) 63% of the world’s electricity is not produced by coal fired power stations. Which is why I ignored your Mae Dit example, it is not representative of the majority of electricity generation. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fossil_fuel_power_station