Chomper Higgot

I never made such an allegation. Please provide a link where I did.

You’ve made the allegation, now back it up. Give me an example of me engaging in mass psychosis.

By providing links to the relevant law and not engaging in personal attacks.

I didn’t read a link to make my post. I’ve provided a link to Federal Law per your request, deal with it.

Making a joke out of of sexual exploitation of a young woman because you don’t have an argument Anglo at the legal facts.

She was under the age of 18, and therefore not legally competent to give conscientious to engage in paid. Regardless of which paid sex with someone under the age of 18 is a federal crime. Refer link in previous post above.

You can start with 18 U.S. Code § 1591 - Sex trafficking of children or by force, fraud, or coercion

Under what law?

It doesn’t matter, she was a US citizen trafficked out of the US for sex.

Whataboutary.

Give me some examples of were I have labelled peaceful protests as ‘hate speech’? Or do you feel you can just make stuff up?!

You clear do not understand the law, certainly not US Federal (extra territorial) Law as it relates to trafficking US citizens for sex and the age of consent to engage in paid sex (regardless of who is doing the paying).

I’m not sure you understand the law on this matter. His victim was an American, and was trafficked for the proposed of sex. Regardless, my statement is still correct, Prince Andrew was credibility accused, Refer court filing I have posted.

https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/advice_information/pcsc-policing-act-protest-rights/

You can’t even get your whataboutary right. The existence of mass psychosis amongst the extreme rightwing stands independent of mass psychosis elsewhere.

I wonder if this is a shot across the bows, a sign that King Charles has changes in mind?

He was accused, refer my post above with link to court filing (an accusation placed before the court).

I didn’t say he was charged, I said he was credibly accused: https://www.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/2015_0102_epsteindershowitz.pdf

I look forward to you providing examples to back up that assertion.

When have I object to peaceful protests?

I support freedom where it is not using/promoting hate or deliberately spreading harmful lies and misinformation. But you have a difference of opinion that does not involve harm to others, I’ll gladly debate it, as I often do. That aside the current government has enacted laws and is moving to enact more laws that severely restrict the right to protest and freedom of expression. That’s a threat that is currently underway.

I feel your pain bro. I really do.

That’s a very strange line of argument. Andrew is credibly accused of sex crimes. Criticizing him for this is not the same thing as abusing people over their gender. Andrew has a recourse, he can claim slander and go to court, though the ‘discovery’ process might dissuade him. That aside, this rightwing government has made and is making multiple assaults on the right to protest. It is a rightwing government that is criminalizing protest.

I’m a fan of London’s Black cabs, they are the only taxi service I use in when I’m London. They are are more expensive but I refuse to engage with the gig-economy, a fair price to give a working man a decent income is to me a price worth paying. I did however learn very early on not to engage the drivers of London’s Black Cabs in conversation, they are renowned for their bigoted rants. Of course that might be a gross negative generalization which we don’t do around here.

I think this is something you should take up with the people who promised to do something about it. Addressing your concerns to the people who told you at the time you were being lied to seems very odd.