Chomper Higgot

The ‘I’m rubber, your glue’ response.

Nah, it was caused by racist thugs doing that ‘scapegoat a totally innocent minority ethnic/religious group’ thing. It’s a behavior that has a history, just as excusing it does.

Also a gun owner who hunts and supports gun controls. And…. he’s not weird.

His co-investor is Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, so yeh, it’s all about free speech.

Up next, Musk files suit against prospective customers who read a motoring review and bought Fords.

The very best of British. Tolerance and unity in the face of hate driven division.

Not a fan of the First Amendment and Free Speech then.

Well done. Lets have no more of these claims from the extreme rightwing that they represent anything other than their own hatred. I’ll add a distinction here. The racist thugs are of the ‘extreme far right’, they are not of the ‘mainstream political rightwing’ many of whom have not hesitated in criticizing these thugs and have spoken up against racism, Islamophobia and hate mongering. There are notable examples of rightwing members on this forum who have without reservation spoken up against these thugs and their hate driven crimes. This needs to be recognized. The distinction is clear.

Here’s weird. When Vance was asked if he will debate Waltz, he replied he will only debate Harris because, here’s the weird bit, Waltz will be replaced as Harris’ VP pick. Weird in so many fronts. 1. The GOP VP pick debating the Democrat Presidential candidate is not a thing. (That would be Trump’s job, and where is he?) 2. Vance must have found the idea Waltz is to be replaced in some weird corner of his imagination, or perhaps down the back of his sofa. Waltz is not going to be taken off the ticket. 3. There is a VP pick who has failed right out of the gate, a guy who is in very shaky ground and is in danger of being thrown under the 101 Bus to Rikers Island, his name, assuming he hasn’t changed it again, is JD Vance. Voice your fears JD and hope the rest of us don’t notice.

Unsubstantiated trolling. But I do understand, you know the Harris Waltz ticket isn’t good news for your November hopes.

At last, a good news topic.

Quit with the Rightwing Liberty thing. That died when they got fixated on what goes on in other people’s bedrooms, restricting the rights of some to make those it own health choices and a strange fixation on what’s on the inside of other people’s pants.

I rather hope the shock continues.

It’s never too late.

Do you mind if I remind you neither Islam nor Muslims had any part in the heinous murder of three children ( the subject of this thread)?

We perhaps should have a thread on that. This isn’t it. Which begs a question. Why are you banging on about Islam and Muslims in the thread discussing a heinous murder of three children that has nothing whatsoever to do with Islam and Muslims? Why?

Did I tell you that? Link a post of me doing so. Or did you make it up?

You seem to forget, it was you that introduced these vile abuses into the discussion adding them to your previous off topic Islamophobic diatribe. I don’t need to deflect any criticism from Islam, it’s completely off topic. Once again, because it clearly isn’t getting through to you. Islam and Muslims had no part at all in the heinous murder of three children, which is the subject of this thread.

All in your own head. Please bother someone who cares.

Oh you’re back I see.

The fist question it begs is, why you accuse me of something that you now admit I have never posted any statement in support of? The answer is, you had zero basis for doing so. The next question it begs is why, when you have listed a set of abhorrent practices that are found in multiple cultures do you list these in your off topic Islam issue? These practices are found in some cultures that follow Islam, some cultures that follow Christianity, some cultures that follow other religions. And, they have absolutely nothing to do with the heinous murder of three children which is the topic of discussion. So no, you are correct, I have never supported these abhorrent practices. And they are not limited to Islam. So back at you. Stop digging.

I have called out your completely off topic Islamophobic diatribe and in doing so referenced the post in which you delivered it. You have responded by listing a bunch of your other off topic Islamophobic issues and then accused me of supporting them. Here’s a simple challenge for you, it will reveal whether or not you are making stuff up: Produce any post from me in which I support or approve of any of these things, your accusation, now you back it up: “So, I take it that you approve of the female genital mutilation of 12 year old girls in the UK, and that you approve of honour killings, and the forced marriages of prepubescent schoolgirls to middle aged uncles in the UK.”

So now you are wandering off into complete baseless accusation. Not because you have any reason to, not because it’s the topic of discussion. There’s no logic to you doing so, there is not rationality to you doing so. You just want to. Blind perjorative accusations on your part. Have a word with yourself.

It’s meant to sound like you responding to the the heinous murder of three children by reaching for your Islam/Muslim thing. If it doesn’t sound like that then I apologize. ——- The rest of your post is a non sequitur, and yet more evidence of you engaging in the off topic issues you have.

Revisionism isn’t going to help you. I did not accuse you of blaming Muslims or Islam for the Heinous murder of three children. I said: “Heinous murder of three children, reach for your Islam/Muslim thing. It precisely what you did.” There’s a subtle but important difference, that centers on fact. You should find a thread on the subject of Islam in which to post your essays.