Jump to content

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    37,196
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    39

Everything posted by Chomper Higgot

  1. No it contains allegations ‘Hamas apologist’, is libel something you normally engage? It’s not wise thing to partake of here in Thailand.
  2. The video is an obvious hit piece. ’The ministry of foreign affairs AKA Hamas’ Obviously the MoFA is not Hamas, something an organization that claims to campaign for accuracy in reporting ought to be aware of; it does however play well to some. Again what crimes has Mapheze Saleh committed?
  3. Oddly neither you nor anyone else has presented any evidence of this woman inciting violence, hate speech or supporting Hamas.
  4. Now that predictions of charges being quietly dropped have turned out to be nonsense it’s only natural to move on to the next prediction of a cause for sullen grievance?!
  5. “The police fearing racial riots have delayed prosecution.” Do have any links to substantiate that claim?
  6. I’m in favor of letting justice run its course.
  7. They have a right to plead not guilty. It’s now for the court and the jury yo decide. Oh and look, charges were not dropped.
  8. Trump has a great deal of bankruptcy experience and a track record of funneling tax payer’s money to his own pockets, Musk the single biggest private recipient of Federal subsidies. A couple of welfare queens.
  9. Musk giving press conferences from the Oval Office while Trump sat there looking like a lost grandad who doesn’t know what’s going on around him is all the warning anyone should need. Musk is clearly running the show. An unelected billionaire who is constitutionally barred from the Presidency has taken advantage of an old man whose out of it. The times still think the Billionaire has their best interests in mind.
  10. Thank you, we already have the Government’s own press release. Do you agree with me that it’s the Government’s duty to provide security to communities subjected to the threat of hate crimes?
  11. Well it seems Stuart Machin is concerned about costs. Unless the money is going in his own pocket.
  12. I’ve already explained in my post. And went further in discussing the very positive news in the link you provided. You should read it.
  13. I do hope we all support the Government’s funding to protect the two named communities in this press release and also that we can all agree the funding provided to protect these communities is not a cost against or of these communities but the cost of protecting both communities against the hate crimes to which both have been subjected: For the record, I fully support the Government funding to provide increased security for both these communities. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-commits-more-funding-to-protect-uk-muslims
  14. I’m not sure who the money is given to, I would expect it’s allocated to the police and, thanks to the link you provided, we know it is a budget allocation to provide security for two communities that have suffered hate crimes. Where is the evidence this other public funding? Referring to the link you provided, do you agree the Government has a duty to provide security for the two named communities that have been subjected to targeted hate crimes?
  15. Had Badenoch any sense she would have stopped stopped, but she didn’t. She then continued with her pre-planned questions seemingly not noticing PM Starmer had said he did not agree with the judges ruling. In doing so she left the door wide open for Starmer to remind her that it was the Tories that put the immigration specific immigration in place, it was the Tories that set up the ruling the Judge passed. Another Tory mess for Labour to fix. Bit do get distracted by the outrage of the judge’s father expressing his own views.
  16. I apologize. You weren’t making stuff up, you were misrepresenting the Government’s funding to protect both Muslim and Jewish communities in the UK. The funding is a fixed amount, it does not increase just because someone builds a new Mosque. Thank you for the link.
  17. This Stuart Machin: https://www.thegrocer.co.uk/news/marks-and-spencer-ceo-stuart-machin-sees-pay-rise-by-2m/691995.article#:~:text=Marks %26 Spencer boss Stuart Machin,year to 30 March 2024.
  18. Does this bother you when other buildings are being built?
  19. What’s the problem with the government providing funds to protect communities subject to threats of violence?
  20. So long as it’s not out of your own pocket or taxes you pay, why is the cost concerning to you?
  21. So why the discussion of the father? Unless of course there isn’t really a problem with the son, and it’s necessary to attempt to smear him with the outrage of his father expressing his own views. Judges rule on matters of law. Perhaps someone drafted the law loosely.
×
×
  • Create New...