Chomper Higgot

I think I knew that, but thanks anyway.

There’s a reason it sounds racist Richard. Because it is. “Nothing has worked in the past” Except something has worked in the past: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-45572691

I rather like the idea of it being a bait and switch. I doubt very much it was, but the thought of the lifelong conman Donald Trump falling for a bait and switch is too pleasant to let go.

Which branch of mathematics requires any discussion on homosexuality, let alone sin? As for a math teacher students videos on the subject of ‘masculinity’?! Of course he thinks it’s acceptable because he’s ‘a Christian’. I think the term creep fits better.

The Telegraph gives Labour 3 weeks to fix knife crime before declaring a Labour failure. Or to put it another way. The election results came out three weeks ago, the staff of The Telegraph still haven’t got over it.

It’s an opinion piece and obviously part of Trump’s election campaign messaging. It’s core message requires readers to suspend all critical thinking to believe Trump would do anything other than exactly what a Putin wants. Perhaps we can have news items going forward.

Many people are saying: Donald Trump is scared to debate Kamala Harris.

That from a guy who posts a fabricated pejorative statement and then gets shirty when called out for having done so. You have produced zero evidence that your post was based on any news source.

It works like this. You make a claim, you back it up.

That might be a second settlement.

OK. So an unsubstantiated claim. What is it you rounded it off with? ffs?!

Be assured, he won’t be the one fighting.

Link please.

The suspended officer is certified to carry and use guns. In the first instance, if he’s the officer that kicked the already tased guy being arrested in the head then his suitability to carry a gun needs to be examined. But of course that’s all a ‘heat of the moment’ issue. As troubling is the failure of the police to take the guy who had been kicked in the head directly to hospital. I predict a hefty settlement.

How did that work out in the latest election on which you were commenting on?

Who’s been posting those people’s opinions to back their arguments on this forum?

I was going to suggest you should take up fiction writing….

Trump hiding from debating Harris. It’s not a good look.

Trump targets Harris. I trust it has been explained to him he’s just walked into a two way street.

How about you respecting the right and freedom of American Representatives to decide who they do and do not wish to pander to, without you spewing the allegation or ‘anti-semitism’ and ‘pandering to Hamas’? Give it a try.

Yeh yeh. Opinions differ.

Nobody is pandering to Hamas. You made that up.

Nobody’s forcing you.

Not pandering to a war criminal is a good look.

No it was a jury of Trumps peers in open court of law. You obviously missed it. Or was it, as I predicted, that you would never accept any indictment, prosecution or conviction of Trump?!