Jump to content

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    32,496
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Chomper Higgot

  1. Another law and order crusader who goes on the lam when he’s on the receiving end of the law and order he wants everyone else to be subjected to.
  2. You forgot to add your customary denial of being a Trump supporter. I only mention it incase there’s room for confusion on the matter.
  3. Clearly explained logical thought gets you thinking about slurping cool-aid.
  4. Let me explain this to you in very simple terms. President Biden withdrew from the running (he was not the Democrat candidate). Once he had withdrawn any support for his candidacy was irrelevant, he was no longer seeking the nomination. Harris is a good candidate, witnessed by her energizing and uniting the Democrats, I hope she does get the formal appointment as the Democrat Candidate.
  5. They were engaging in something that belongs in the bedroom? I missed that.
  6. If that helps you come to terms with the fact Harris is uniting and energizing the Democrats and gaining in the polls then stick with telling yourself that lie.
  7. 1. “as it was intended for Jurists to not be stained by corruption” Well that’s not gone too well has it? 2. “If Federal Judiciary held lifetime seats, they would not feel the need to"repay" anyone or any party, and could make rulings based on their interpretation of the Constitution.” But if they did feel the need and or had fallen short of #1, then they have a life time to enjoy their corruption. 3. Engage that UC Berkeley Constitutional Law thing of yours and explain precisely what in President Biden’s proposals warrants this assertion: “Stripping the ability of the Judiciary from "checking" the excesses of the Legislative Branch would be the beginning of real totalitarianism in the US.”
  8. It’s because you don’t understand that there was no cult of Biden.
  9. I think you were directly replying to the post you actually replied to.
  10. I’m sure you’ve been told a million times not to exaggerate.
  11. Not content with the Christian faux outrage over the representation of a pagan festival, you engage in imagining alternatives causes for outrage. You’ll never slate this thirst, it’s all of your own making.
  12. Can you provide a link to back up that claim or are you making an unsubstantiated assertion? I’ll not hold my breath for your link.
  13. Put your specs on and re-read my post. And next time try not to embarrass yourself:
  14. That’s incorrect. They need, at the time of application for a visa and later upon application for indefinite right to remain, meet minimum income requirements. Thereafter, they need meet no such income requirements.
  15. Well I would agree with you on the point of the police having too many powers, but suspect Yaxley Lennon and his supporters were very much in favor of the knee jerk terrorism laws. He, and they, perhaps thought those laws would be reserved for others. Handing power to Government in reaction to a perceived threat is seldom a good idea.
  16. Neither does Ella Emhoff, she is a model. Go on show us your pic, I promise I’ll be woke about it and not body shame you.
  17. But we are now in a time when a convicted felon is a candidate for the Presidency, and that’s only a fraction of his ‘baggage’.
  18. Non of which will change until corruption of the SCOTUS is addressed. President Biden has picked a policy that has broad public support, but which threatens all the powerful interests you mention. My expectation is this proposal will face a concerted push back from the hyper wealthy and their shills, but if it gains traction with the electorate Harris will add it to her platform. The timing is perfect.
×
×
  • Create New...