EVENKEEL

Seems the BIB just signed on a new customer, after she pays the initiation fee.

My ship anchored at Darwin a few times, nice place. Short boat ride in, walk to restaurants and bars.

I've been at the think I'll stop the beers for awhile phase as well. Then I realized the few beers I have gives me more joy than not having them. And I'm not a quitter.

I do 4 small beers early afternoon, sometimes at the beach, sometimes at home while I play pool. It becomes a daily routine I enjoy. Early to bed, early to rise. No hangover

And if folks stopped giving him their attention, maybe he'll go away.

It will be interesting.....

I hate quitters.

Come on go ahead, what's a few beers? Don't cheat yourself.

Ok it will be in interesting to see how it all unfolds. PP is quite the guy who after opening door returned to attacker. Unless of course the two were standing next to door and PP used his free hand to open door and depape instantly hit PP before police could intervene.

Name is William Scott SF Chief of Police, I got it wrong.

Was there a political motivation for the attack? It makes sense. Is the depape mentally ill? I'm not a doctor, but from what I read it seems plausible.

I'm just asking one question. Who opened the door? That's it, that will solve the puzzle for me. And if the official report was forthcoming the door opener would be identified. As for the nutter's reason, I really don't give a fork.

That official report has much very detailed info. In my opinion identifying the one who opened the door makes sense in a report so detail oriented. What is so hard to understand? As to why the mentally ill depape who thought he was Jesus did what he did? Well he's crazy, that's why he did it. Oh, before I forget, it's not nice to get so personal.

Me, I find it interesting that some can read the same reports I read and think, Looks good to me. Why does it matter who opened the door? It's all in the "report" There's nothing suspicious here.

Who opened the door for police? Real easy question but so far no one can answer it logically. Apparently what Rick Scott the SF Chief of Police had to say was false.

Try reading the official report linked above. They don't sinc.

Did you read it? How did the cops gain entry? Doesn't say in that official report.

Because he opened the door for cops who are standing ready to enter and Pelosi decides to engage attacker.....really? That's the scenario you believe?

https://nypost.com/2022/10/31/paul-pelosi-attack-a-timeline-of-david-depapes-alleged-assault/ "DePape and Pelosi had gone downstairs by the time police arrived and knocked on the door, which the 82-year-old rushed to open. “Pelosi grabbed onto DePape’s hammer, which was in DePape’s hand. At this point in the interview, DePape repeated that [he] did not plan to surrender and that he would go ‘through’ Pelosi.” It was then he began beating Pelosi with the hammer, fracturing his skull in the process, cops said.

That's all anybody has unless maybe you're in the know.

Well I'm super impressed with your work history. For me it was 30 yrs ago yes robbery is the usual intended outcome of a successful home invasion.

Whatever the truth is. I just find it odd that the personal accounts from Pelosi and from the cops are somewhat different. Why are the stories so mixed up.

200 officers used and found 2 pos urine samples. Job well done.

I didn't pay Tea Money but was charged 1000 thb for residence cert.

Why the cops didn't have body cams for such a high profile case is puzzling. Just a thought.