BobBKK

It was a little humour with a basis of truth - who cares if he had a porn star? What we must care about is that this will be overturned at the SC, but long after the election, it is classic electoral interference.

Meanwhile, back in fact-based-land, Former Manhattan D.A. prosecutor Elliot Felig today admitted that if his name was not Trump, the case would not have been brought, AND all the appeals judges are Dem appointees.

The YouTube channel is condos - what is the confusion? Foreigners have a 49% quota. Why mention nominee companies (which are sometimes used for houses and land)?

I have never met a Buddhist in Thailand, but they exist in the forests, I'm told.

Is that right? maybe just for foreigners certainly not for Thais?

That can't be right or we'd all go back to UK periodically - get the increase - then come back to Thailand - then rinse and repeat.

I agree - we should debate and argue respectfully, not AD HOMINEM on both sides. BTW, I am far from a conservative.

You are getting confused. Foreigners may buy up to 49% of condo buildings - legally.

You sound like a laugh a minute. If you love the tea total lifestyle, Thailand is not for you.

Change schools

Philippines you get all your annual rises - Thailand has simply not got an agreement with Thailand. It is OUTRAGEOUS.

We all know how unfair the system is, but Thailand does not have a treaty with the UK like the Philippines. If she returns to the UK, her pension will be updated to the current level, which begs the question: If she left again in six months, would she keep the new rate here?

I do agree it is horrible - never seen it so divided.

Not a source for factual information. Pick another source and I'll read your link

Thank you. This is a very liberal board; common sense and stable, reasoned debate are often lost here. Many legal scholars decry this farce, and not one thinks it will not be thrown out on appeal. The facts are: Dem judge (whose daughter works for the Dems), Dem jury pick from Dem Manhattan, Dem prosecutor raising a SEVEN-year-old misdemeanour to a felony. Prime witnesses - a convicted LIAR and a porn star who signed a letter saying Trump was innocent. It will go to appeal, probably lose and eventually go to SC. It is a very sad day for American justice; in many people's opinion, it is also sad few want to discuss it rationally here, but it is not surprising.

Don't think too much - it was a little humour amongst all this flaming and trolling

There are no correct channels, and it's prohibited. The only thing he SHOULD have done was hire a Thai with a bronze license.

It is used by both sides, unfortunately, but we don't need to use it here on a farang debating site IMHO.

It can and will go to the SC; that's the process. I don't watch Fox, and I'm not a Trump voter - sunshine.

I understand that but how about misdemeanours not prosecuted, many years old, and outside statute of limitations?

Please be polite and respectful to others

Appealed - watch this space

Not true - to move the case away from Manhattan would have been fairer. Trump's lawyers moved for this, and it was DENIED.

That's a lie - Manhattan votes 90% for Dems, and you know it. There is a limit to how many Jurors can be rejected, and you know it. You know all of this but you chose to be blind.

I'm really embarrassed for you if you cannot see it. The choice of judge? the area it was tried? the jurors? the discredited witnesses? the TIMING?