
Caldera
-
Posts
7,450 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Events
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Gallery
Blogs
Posts posted by Caldera
-
-
22 minutes ago, brianthainess said:
That would barely cover the fuel cost.
Maybe they do it in the same way as some forms of public transport - you'll have to wait until the truck is full. So depending on how many others they catch who need to be transported to Bangkok, it could take a while. ????
-
1
-
-
On 8/10/2020 at 10:36 PM, edwardandtubs said:
That's a far more sensible way of doing it. Pity the Pattaya branch didn't get the memo.
Apparently they've received the memo in the meantime. When I contacted them a few days later, they only wanted a photo of the entry stamp, plus a confirmation from me that I'm not / wasn't on overstay. I agree that it's unreasonable to expect photos of each and every passport page.
Their deadline (August 17th) is fast approaching though and I'm still exploring other options, so after having received their confirmation that it could be done, I have yet to decide if I'll go ahead with it.
-
As there are flights to the UK available that actually happen, I think they will probably follow other embassies who have stated that they will not issue visa extension letters.
I'd imagine that an embassy (any embassy) might still issue them in cases of extraordinary hardship, decided case by case, but that remains to be seen.
-
1
-
-
"The first case is a 24-year-old Thai construction worker who returned home on July 7 and went back to Japan on August 1, where he was found to be infected, Dr Suwannachai said."
I'm a bit surprised to read such a report. So this construction worker went through all the trouble to secure a repatriation flight to Thailand and spend 14 days locked up in state quarantine, only to travel back to Japan 10 days after being released from quarantine?
I don't buy that Thailand has eliminated the coronavirus, so I'm not surprised that it's seen as a possibility that he got infected while in Thailand.
I think one reason why neither Thailand nor its neighbors seem very eager to open the land borders is that they would all find plenty of cases imported from supposedly virus-free neighboring countries. That would shatter the illusion.
-
1
-
-
Phnom Penh has been known as quite strict and there's very little if anything that agents can do to help. While it's hard to predict what they (or any other Thai embassy for that matter) will be like next year, I wouldn't go there.
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
No way.
-
4
-
Well in fairness, according to the news report that included the address of the premises that were raided, this was NOT the Thai Visa Centre office, but Grace's residential address.
If they had targeted Thai Visa Centre, they would have (also) raided their office - even Thai immigration should be able to get that address from their public Facebook page. ????
So their explanation that this raid was related to Grace's other (or past) activities cannot really be dismissed out of hand.
-
2
-
-
Whatever we may think of this drama, I cannot help but notice that they are very confident that they've resolved the situation to everyone's satisfaction. And they probably have, as it so often plays out here.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, NanLaew said:And, at the end of the day, you'd STILL be here which is what you want, no?
Why on earth should Thai immigration welcome the sort of person who confesses that they, "don't want to go home and try to find a job". They can't easily get a job here even if they wanted to so no, they don't want a whole slew of uninsured 'Covid refugees' with fundamentally limited resources hanging out here only because they think things are worse back home and they aren't willing to lift a finger to make their own situation better.
You're making loaded assumptions about people who have chosen to remain in Thailand on amnesty. Being one of them, let me tell you two things: Firstly, I don't need to work, neither at home nor in Thailand. So it would be pointless for me to go home to find a job. Secondly, I have insurance and my insurance covers COVID-19 in Thailand, which I specifically confirmed with my insurance company.
Maybe Thai immigration shares your concerns, but they did nothing to address them. Before the first amnesty was announced, they asked people in need of a special extension to get silly embassy letters, landlord documents and to take a set of photos at their residence. They didn't ask for proof of funds to remain or proof of insurance. Go figure.
-
4
-
2 hours ago, anchadian said:
Let's hope you do have a plan B, otherwise your preference to remaining in Thailand will be at some other accommodation.
Duh, my plan B remains the same, I simply changed my flight booking from July 30th to September 24th. I'm not feeling stressed at all, I'm just keeping an open mind about all the options that exist and might open up...
-
2
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
2 hours ago, ttkeric said:Sigh.... I think some people still can't get it into their heads that this isn't a good time to be a tourist. Anywhere. Period.
Sorry, but travelling for leisure is something for the back burner for the moment.
I can only speak for myself, but I had a GREAT time traveling in Thailand in the last two months, since the restrictions on interprovincial travel were lifted in June.
So I used the amnesty for tourists as intended: to do touristy things!
-
5
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, sitti said:I just don't understand some people here. Thai government already gave you plenty of time to leave legally for those who aren't supposed to remain in the country for extended period. You were supposed to use your time given to make your own arrangement to leave. Have you even tried contacting your embassy? I see the complainers are just milking the amnesty.
There's nothing wrong with "milking the amnesty", as long as people have a plan B for when it ends. I was prepared to leave at the end of July, I had a flight booked - one that has a proven track record of actually taking place no less. But when they extended the amnesty, why should I have left? I prefer staying here, it's as simple as that.
-
8
-
24 minutes ago, BritTim said:
I think this thread is a useful one, as it may clarify whether regular 30-day extensions (and 60-day extensions to visit family) will be permitted for those on tourist entries who already have stayed over six months longer than they normally would have been allowed to.
True. I guess the reason why we haven't had reports yet (either way) is that people are waiting for reports before heading to immigration themselves. ????
I'm no exception. I'd go myself to give it a shot, but I prefer to wait for a bit longer to see if any positive or negative reports surface.
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, mtls2005 said:
Another consitution?
Just make a copy of rev. 1997.
Without going into detail, I think they should go a bit beyond merely going back to the 1997 constitution. But that would make a good interim one that could be enacted quickly.
-
1
-
-
Not sure if insuring them is such a good idea, they will just drive even more recklessly.
-
It isn't believable that they had zero deaths before and now they're suddenly having a handful from just a few hundred cases.
They simply didn't test enough people and the coronavirus has been spreading largely undetected, thanks to a very young population.
-
1
-
-
It could be as low as zero if they don't reopen the borders at some point (to foreign tourists, that is). A bit premature to talk numbers at this point!
-
2
-
-
I've visited twice within just a few weeks. Definitely a lot more pleasant than before the lockdown!
-
1 hour ago, ubonjoe said:
Some offices just don't follow the rules.
Sad but true. On the other hand, have you seen any reports of anyone getting that "regular" extension since the "grace period" kicked in on August 1st? If so, from where? I'm tempted to give it a shot at Chaeng Watthana.
-
1 hour ago, pavierre said:
He didn't get the stamp at immigration, it was stamped for him at another immigration office and then mailed back to him
Which immigration office was that?
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
32 minutes ago, finy said:I thought someone said it cost 2,000 to change to ED visa at immigration when temporary rules came out?
That's the official fee for a non-immigrant visa. What is being discussed here is the "agent-enabled" non-immigrant visa application to study at an informal school for those on tourist entries that are now on automatic extension ("amnesty"). There's quite a premium attached to this premium service.
-
4
-
10 hours ago, 363885 said:
It won't expire till next March, since I renewed just before going to Laos. But I'm still anxious to get back, as I'm still paying rent and most of my personal belongings are in Thailand.
I'm a bit surprised to hear that. I, too, visited Laos from Thailand in March, but the writing was on the wall that the borders were about to close at short notice. I needed a border bounce, so I just kept my trip shorter than I had planned. As you had just renewed for another year in Thailand, I'm surprised that you took the chance to travel to Laos at that time.
Out of curiosity, what's the situation like in Laos now? Is everything open? How about your visa there, do they still offer paid extensions for 30 days a time?
I hope you can return to Thailand soon, but as others I suspect they'll keep the borders closed for some more time. Quite a mess.
-
It's hard to tell at this point. Will there be horrific reports of adverse effects? Will a vaccination be required to travel? Etc. etc., many aspects to consider.
That said, I'm leaning towards yes, provided it's both safe and effective. So that's what I voted for. I won't be in a hurry until that will be known with a high degree of certainty.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
6 minutes ago, ezzra said:other options that are available albeit pricey are 3 months extension due to "sickness" and a one year "volunteer" visa...
I take it the OP isn't currently in Thailand. Most likely, their visa will just expire and they will have to start over anew once somewhat normal travel has been restored.
-
3
-
1
Not looking good to extend visa - Richard Barrow
in Thai Visas, Residency, and Work Permits
Posted
I'm of two minds about the guy. His reporting is often excellent and he clearly fills a void as local journalism is in a really sad state. On the other hand, he often comes across as arrogant and attention seeking for nothing but his own gratification.
I'm not surprised that the Thai authorities see his shenanigans with suspicion, and again I'm of two minds about it. Sometimes I'm glad that he exposes the truth and we all know how much those in power despise that. On other occasions he picks silly little battles (double pricing) and effectively baits the authorities by saying he shouldn't really do that while his "visa" is up for extension. So his trouble is kind of self-inflicted, maybe he wants to get kicked out to secure a book deal or something.
Then there's the fact that he says blogging is his "hobby", when clearly it is a lot more than that. As he gets compensated with stays at hotels quite frequently, the question of illegal work might also be on immigration's mind.
My guess is that he will ultimately get his extension. But who knows!