robblok

Money and policitcal games same when the PTP turned on cannabis because it made someone popular. Cant have policies that are popular from other parties. Add to that the high chance that brewers have bought people off and then we get this.

Some people respond bad to cannabis. A friend of mine gets really fearful when taking it. My experience is that cannabis usually enhances feelings. I would not recommend it if you have problems like this. That is just my opinion other people might think otherwise. I usually respond good to it as im usually happy, but in times of stress if noticed it making things worse. But just try and like so many said take less and you have less THC.

I also never got it offered but i know where to get it if i wanted. In general drugs are not pushed on the street that much but you need to look for it. It wont be pushed in your face. Same like cannabis before i knew where to get it but was never offered. Far to risky for them to openly offer it.

Yes far more is not caught, but if it was that bad that everyone was an addict and responded badly to it it would be more in the news. As with all drugs the majority of people taking it are not crazed druggies. Not saying that this stuff is good for your health. But if people became so violent on it then given the amounts we would see far more problems then what we are currently seeing. This stuff is definitely bad but it cant be as bad as people think given the quantities used and how often it is in the news.

There is a difference between greed and trying to scrape by a living. Greed is totally different and you have no proof the guy had other means of surviing. Not all people have enough money to survive. I would say greedy if he had good income and then went for even more. IMHO this guy was just trying to survive and made stupid decision. That is as far as I go. And yes wildlife reserves are for wildlife, when you go there its at your own risk and the elephants did not do anything wrong. But to attach greed without knowing the guys personal circumstances is just insulting.

Where I am from you can default on loans and so on you go into debt structuring and live at a minimum for 3 years or so. However all income and money counts. So your money would count too and your wife would not be able to enter because you are her husband and have money. I can imagine similar rules in Thailand else its too easy to skip debts.

That would be a good option but that still means she has to work and sees little of her money back. Its seems he wants to prevent this option as it means she is basically not getting much money. This is an option I would go for it will take a while but what else is there.

Why dont you pay her bills for a year while she fully uses her salary to pay the debt off. I mean if its 90% of her salary then by cutting costs and you paying for living (not too expensive and it can be done over time). You could also go for a longer period. But with you helping the debt could go away.

I now understand why your nobodysfriend. I agree its preventable and the elephants are not to blame. But to call someone greedy without knowing their situation is a bit over the top. Usually people like this are dirt poor and do this to make some extra money. Its a bad decision on his part but to call him greedy is over the top.

Strange that people are moaning about this. In many civilized countries you can't keep money that is deposited in your account wrongly. In this case though its IMHO more about money mules. I find Thaivisa posters strange people bleating and moaning when they loose a small payment on Lazada to a scammer while here defending people who spend money that is not theirs. You can't have it both ways. Laws like this are usually meant to make sure money mules (if you don't know what those are educate yourself) liable so fraud is combatted. If you want to be protected from fraud then you must also protect people who send money wrong and to have punishment against money mules. People seem to hate banks and seem to think banks should always pay out. Strange. I hate scammers and people who keep wrongly deposited money are scammers too.

Your right i misread, still i stand with my opinion that carrying weapons is a stupid thing. Now this guy will go to jail for murder. Weapons escalate things, not deescalate. But your 100% right i misread.

That is why people who carry weapons on them are IMHO at more danger. When tempers flare weapons get used. Best not to go packing as weapons can also be turned on yourself. Weapons make people do things they normally would not like standing up and fighting when running is smarter. Sure in some rare cases weapons are useful. When your with your back to a wall and have no other choice. But in general your legs are your best weapon (running away)

Old dinosaurs on the opposition. Hope many young people will leave the opposition for what it is. I don't like the current government but the drug policy i great finally legal cannabis. Great step forward. I propose that if we make weed illegal we do the same for alcohol. Lets see how long the policy then stays popular.

Seems logical, if you rent something you have to return it the way you got it. Sure flooding is bad but its just something that can happen. But the guy is lucky the price of 2500 bt seems right I had my bike flooded in the past and they repaired it for a similar price

Yes that is exactly what im saying. Millions of people fly.. a percentage of that is sure not to turn of their phones. Do you deny that ? So far no planes have crashed because of it (never been in the news). Is it not a risk.. maybe its a risk but not a big risk at all otherwise we would have seen plane crashes already. Maybe its like the fact you can die from a bee sting.. its a risk.. but minimal.

The whole phone on planes has never really been proven either. I mean do you really think everyone always turns off their phones ? I am pretty sure people forget at times. Havent heard of a single incident because of it. I know safety first but should things like that not be tested if its factual.

What a stupid remark, yes many foreigners are here for the girls (wives / gfs / pay for play) but most of those i would say the big majority is legal. Sure there are pedophiles but these are a minority. Anyone saying something stupid like this is either a troll or uniformed.

I am curious why people are so ok about this if someone is high and causes a problem. Everyone wants to hang him high. Now a guy is drunk and damaging property and people just laugh it off. If you cant handle your alcohol or whatever drug you use then don't use it selfish people. Use whatever you want but dont bother others.

Not sure its legal. Does owning a weapon not make you more careless. I mean going for defense instead of run ?

Some things cant be prevented. This sounds like one of those things.

Nah you can compare it more with an alcoholic whose brain has been damaged. The price of these drugs is so low that its not monetary. Right now the price is at al all time low. Perhaps the drugs did not even play that much of a role at all and the problems came from the stress of losing his job. Its easy to always blame things on drugs. But with none in his system it will be a hard sell.

Not sure why everyone is ranting about drugs in this case. There were no drugs in his system when he attacked. So he was not under the influence of drugs. He MIGHT have mental issues from drugs but that is not sure at all. Just an easy way for the PTP to attack the change in current drugs laws (that dont even are about the drug that was used here). Cheap shot of Thaksin.

What is it with the obsession of fighting and self defence. Best option is always to run or de escalate. Pride.. I dont care about it. My life and health is more important. If you see a lot of fights and encounter a lot of violence, maybe its time to change your habits or veneus. Most of us live our life without the need of self defense.