Dan O

Trump lives by the adage that any press is good press because it spreads his name recognition. He's antics and arrogance fuels like minded people to believe its ok to insult and degrade anyone that disagrees with you. In his mind belittling people establishes his superiority over them even though its just in his mind. To find a villain you can blame for all the problems in life. It plays into his megalomaniacal narcissistic personality. He has no moral compass because he's never had to have one as his father spoon feed him financially and gave him access to a level of importance he could not attain himself or he would be a nobody that no one would take seriously

I don't recall hearing about too many Americans that want to work for minimum wage and being displaced by any foreigners Regardless of immigration status foreigners will do what they need to do to earn a living where US citizens avoid menial and low paying jobs.

Why do you care Bob? You're not even American and your story is just made up bs

You do know that repeating a lie multiple times doesn't make it come true, right?

Here's the info and what you meant to say about Zelensky and his TV series. From the internet: Servant of the People, also known as Servant of the Nation, is a Ukrainian political satire comedy series created and produced by Volodymyr Zelenskyy. He stars as the main character, Vasyl Petrovych Holoborodko, a high-school history teacher in his 30s. He unexpectedly gets elected for the President of Ukraine after a video filmed by one of his students goes viral, showing him making a profane rant against government corruption in his country. The series ran for three seasons between 2015 and 2019, as well as a film adaptation released in 2016. The series was produced by Kvartal 95, which was founded by Zelenskyy himself. The studio would soon become involved in Ukrainian politics, and in 2018 a political party of the same name as the show was registered. Running as its candidate, Zelenskyy was elected president of Ukraine in 2019. I believe the BBC channel 4 bought the rights at some point

Correct me if I'm wrong but that Act was created following normal protocol not as an executive order or just deciding in a whim, right?

As I said check your facts. No misquote, just a clarification to what you wrote. Comprehension really isn't your strong suit is it?

Might want to check your facts on that. 2. Trump signed the mineral deal and added the potential for the US to become actively involved in the war. No valid bases for the claims of selling US supplied weapons to adversaries. 3. Trumpstarted the process for the developing covid vaccines under his warp speed initiative.

I think the Chinese forgot that Xi called Trump directly very early on and informed him how serious this was already in China and to take precautions as it was extremely contagious and deadly and would spread worldwide rapidly.

The outcome doesn't change for those affected at this point, my family included.

It was concerning shares in media and broadcasting companies. Other business' are not necessarily affected.

Thank the website spell correction feature

You need to move along as your just regurgitating the same nonsense over and over expecting a different result. Its not coming dude. The injunction was issued and its a set back simple and clear. I said that multiple times along with the fact it would be moved on in another court and may not hold. Try using some comprehensive reading skills and stop beating your dead horse argument. Your time on this topic is done as you cant seem to get out if your own way. Good bye

Trump was handed another set back to his executive orders. Extract from AP article: WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge on Friday permanently blocked a White House executive order targeting an elite law firm, dealing a setback to President Donald Trump’s campaign of retribution against the legal profession. U.S. District Beryl Howell said the executive order against the firm of Perkins Coie amounted to “unconstitutional retaliation” as she ordered that it be nullified and that the Trump administration halt any enforcement of it. “No American President," Howell wrote in her 102-page order, "has ever before issued executive orders like the one at issue in this lawsuit targeting a prominent law firm with adverse actions to be executed by all Executive branch agencies but, in purpose and effect, this action draws from a playbook as old as Shakespeare, who penned the phrase: ‘The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.’”

They have nothing to do with this issue. Nice try at deflection but no thank you

Wait all you want the situation is what it is. You claim to be something your not and its obvious by the replies you make that just your feeble defense of a POS that thinks he can do what he want and ignore laws and protocol that he could use correctly. Go cry your blues to someone that cares.

If its common sense why do you keep spouting bs about it being foreign policy. He may be president but he's not a king and he answers to the people. He is held in balance by the courts and the constitutuon not what he thinks it says or wants to twist it to be. The courts are there for a reason and they are doing what they were tasked to do. Even if you dont like the responses they give to the dumbass approach and blatant disregard for laws Trump is displaying

He's a conservative not a liberal or activist and he was appointed by Trump in 2018

No one said its completely settled and I addressed that specifically to you that it will most likely be appealed. Will anything change don't know yet . Go play games somewhere else because it does stand up here

I understand exactly what is going on. I posted this. You on the other hand jumped in claiming you are Perry Mason and know more about the issue when there isn't any more to know yet. Drop the bs about your legal knowledge as it does hold up. You claim that article 2 supports your claim and it has nothing to do with this issue except in your mind.

Might want to check that claim on the judge.

You quoted multiple time I should read article 2 of the constitution as I didn't understand it. Well I think you are the one that clearly didn't understand the article your repeatedly told me to read. Try again as your position arguement has no standing

Off topic again. Try to keep up or stop posting on this thread and start your own with a different topic

This thread is about trump and his issue in court and not about what any other president in either party did. Nice try at gaslighting the topic

You need to put on your mister wizard hat if you categorize this a lawfare considering the directions Trump has issue to the doj to go after fbi agents, lawyers and law firms that may have worked on his cases in the past Kinda hard to claim liberal judges when Trump appointed some of them that have ruled against him. You really need to brush up on facts before you weigh in